Questions of the Day Program
STEM Unbarred: What the initiative is learning about hands-on science for incarcerated youth
In the fifth episode of Season 8 of Questions of the Day, I reconnect with the STEM Unbarred team to ask: what does it take to bring hands-on science to youth in the carceral system, and how do you know it’s working? Joining me are Anagha Krishnan, co-founder of STEM Unbarred; Jade Williams, the initiative’s strategic program manager; and Chiara Benetollo, executive director of the Center for Educational Justice at the Petey Greene Program.
Three years into the program, we explore how their response has evolved. Anagha recalls a recurring message from students: “I like to learn hands on, but I’ve never learned science in a hands on way before.” Responding to that gap means accommodating different educational backgrounds and lengths of stay. As she explains, “a question that really arose early in the program was, well, how do we teach science such that no one is coming in feeling like they’re behind just because they hadn’t attended the previous demo?”
We dig into what the program’s data is telling the team, and what it cannot yet tell them. They describe assessments before and after demonstrations, surveys about interest in science and its everyday relevance, and observations of participation. Alongside these measures, they share accounts of students recalling earlier activities and expressing interest in science careers. These experiences reach us through the organizers, and Chiara distinguishes their expectations from what they can currently establish: “Our hypothesis, our assumption from what we hear from the students is that we are having an impact that lasts much longer than the individual demo. But what we can measure right now are the impacts of one individual demo.” Understanding whether learning and interest persist after students leave remains a priority, requiring additional staff time and capacity.
We also examine what it would take to bring this approach to more students. Volunteer debriefs inform revisions, classroom clickers have simplified assessment, and partnerships support materials and delivery. Funding for staff and transportation remains essential.
Expansion also requires adaptation. As Anagha emphasizes, “We spend a lot of time really understanding the unique needs of students at each facility because the needs of students at each facility are very different.”
Across 21 questions or so, this follow-up explores the problem, the response, the evidence, and the challenges and lessons shaping what comes next.
Explore the conversationFull interview transcript
Fanuel Muindi
Thank you so much for joining me today. I’m joined today by Anagha, Chiara, and Jade from STEM Unbarred, and this is actually a follow-up conversation that we’re going to have today. And this is part of the point of doing these engagements. We want to continue learning from practitioners on the field because guess what? They’re always learning something new. So we’re gonna do it again here with STEM Unbarred. I know last time we chatted was several months ago. In fact, it was a year or some change ago, and you were telling us you and Hannah at that time telling us about how STEM Unbarred at that time was called Science Unlocked.
By the way, fun fact, the name changed. For someone who has not watched that conversation, can you tell us a little bit about what STEM Unbarred is and how it got started?
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, absolutely. So back in 2021, I had just started my PhD, so I had moved to Washington, D.C. to start a PhD in immunology, and I was having a great time. I was loving being in the lab, loving doing my PhD. But something just felt a little missing for me. I was feeling kind of isolated in the lab from like the greater community of DC, this community that I had moved into and really wanted to be a part of, and so I started looking for ways to kind of get involved extracurricularly outside of the lab in different volunteer organizations and different community groups, and I came across an organization called the Petey Greene Program, and the Petey Greene Program in Washington, D.C. was sending in volunteers into carceral facilities in the area to provide tutoring and educational services to individuals that were incarcerated, and I was like, that sounds like a community and a population of people that I previously had never had any experience with, had not interacted with. Let me just let me get involved. Let me see what this is all about, and I started volunteering at a youth carceral facility in Washington, D.C. the D.C. Youth Services Center, as a volunteer tutor, and so I would help students during their study hall with kind of whatever classwork they had in kind of a one-on-one setting. And at the time, I was one of a very limited number of volunteers who had a background in STEM, and so I often would work with students on their math and science homework, and we would, you know, get to talking about you know what they were learning in class, how they felt about class, and over again, I would hear, “Oh, science is my least favorite subject.
It’s so boring. I don’t really like it, and as a scientist, it made me really sad. I was like, “Why don’t you like your science classes? They should be so fun. And so we started talking more. I started sitting in on some science classes students had really got a sense of how students were learning science, and one of the things that really stood out to me was that students did not have the opportunity to do hands-on science labs, and I think if we think back on like what got me excited about science, it was those science labs. It was watching a science teacher light a Cheeto on fire. It was like launching a bottle rocket or having a volcano like that you made in class explode.
And these students weren’t getting those opportunities both while they were in the facility, but for many of them, even in their science classes before they were incarcerated, and so we started thinking about. I started thinking about well, how can we bring these experiences to students? And so we, I asked a crazy question. I said, Hey, can we maybe do a DNA extraction like in inside the facility we can extract DNA from strawberries, and to everyone’s surprise, the answer was yes. Let’s try it out, and so that was the first demonstration we did with students. Students had been learning about DNA in class; they’d learned about the structure of DNA, but they’d never held it in their hands, and so it was an incredibly rewarding kind of first experience to watch students who had asked questions like, “Well, how do I know DNA is real if it’s so small I can’t see it?
Suddenly holding it in their hands, being like, “Oh my gosh, like it looks like snot, and watching that joy and that first kind of hands-on experience with students was really exciting.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, and I want to just dig in a little bit into this because sometimes people rush over this the problem space, right? When you’re designing solutions, and then this is an open question to all of you. You know, what are things that you wish more people understood about this. Problem area that you that STEM Unbarred is tackling, and I want to just start with Anagha. Is there something that you wish more people understood critical things that then can articulate? Right. So this is why this initiative is needed.
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, I think that’s like a great question. So I think there’s a couple of layers. I think to this. So the first layer is that the way we teach science is very different. It’s not universal. It’s not like every you know middle school or high school student is receiving the same quality and the same types of science experiences. And I think sometimes it’s easy for us to kind of as scientists or as people who are excited about science to think back on our own experiences and feel like oh everyone must have you know done the same types of had the same types of scientific educational experiences that I did but the reality is that really is not the case so that would be I think the first layer and I think the second layer is that sometimes we think about science as the actual scientific facts, like the oh, like you know these are you know four base pairs, or you know these are like chemical bonds, or these are physical principles.
And on some level, science is those things. It is it those facts that you know we all take to be true, but I think the step beyond that, and what where science really gets exciting is the process of doing science, the process of discovery, the process of knowing something, the process of setting up an experiment to ask a question, and then answer it, and that I think, if you think about what do I want someone to take away from a science course, yes, on some level it’s the facts, but on another level it’s also the process of here’s how we discover these facts, here’s how we feel confident in these facts that we as a society like hold as scientific truth, and I think part of having a good science experience is being able to go through that process and experience that journey for yourself.
And I think if we don’t give students those opportunities on some level, we’re failing them. So,
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah. And to Jade, can you add to that? I’m thinking more about the carceral space itself as well, in terms of access for that. Can you speak to that?
Jade Williams
Yeah, for sure. Yeah, I think kind of a lot of what Anagha was already saying, but yeah, just the way that there are these like significant systemic and like racial barriers that exist long before a lot of students are incarcerated, and that not only contributes to the reality of their incarceration, but then it gets further confounded in these spaces where there’s even less accessibility, less access, and less access to the type of instructors that would be capable and willing and kind of able to bring things into these spaces, so I think just in terms of how these sort of structures get further compounded in that space, and also I think in terms of the idea of accessibility, I think one of the things that I learned kind of working on this program is I think a lot of the times people have very limited knowledge and sort of imagination of what is possible in these spaces.
So the fact that we were able to bring these things in there is something that surprises people all the time. So I get asked all the time by different like potential partners and things like that of like, if we’re able to do this, like is this possible? And we’re like, yeah, we have a full science program where we are bringing in animals that are dissected and insects and all of these things that you don’t necessarily correlate with carceral spaces. So I think just having the sort of imagination to try and make these things accessible in a space where these things are often not even thought of, and kind of working to compound those disparities in the space,
Chiara Benetollo
I was just going to add a bit more nuance into the picture of those disparities because I think that is a really important context here. Like Jade was saying, those are disparities that are highly racialized. We know that incarceration in general disproportionately affects people of color and especially men who are people of color. If you are a black man. You have one, like one in three black men will end up in prison in the course of their life, according to the latest available data that we have, versus one in 70 white men. So the there is a huge discretion. In there, and this discrepancy is the product of historical systemic, you know, racial discrimination, and it’s a product in part of what we know as the school to prison pipeline, right?
So people get discriminated, get targeted, profiled from well before they are incarcerated, and in a variety of ways, including by being in schools where they don’t have the same opportunities that their whiter, wealthier peers have, and so they end up in prison and or in those carceral spaces, those youth facilities, and oftentimes the narrative that we hear is, okay, you are in prison, like this is the chance to turn a turn your life around, you hit rock bottom, and you know and here’s where you step in, but you don’t. And in part, it’s because the it’s very hard to do education well in carceral spaces because there are limited investment, very limited funding, a lot of issues with accessibility, being able to bring in people and being able to bring in materials, and those constraints are especially relevant for science classes, right?
Because yeah, you can bring in a writing course with one person and a piece of paper, but to bring in a really good science class, you need probably multiple people with different areas of expertise, and you need a lot of materials that are difficult to get cleared. And I’m the stats statistics person in this in the in this group, and so another statistic that I will bring is that almost half of the youth who are incarcerated are like functioning below grade level. They are getting into those prisons with already behind, and they’re not getting better while they are incarcerated, and in fact, a very large number of them end up dropping out of school after they are released.
And so, I think us intervening with those demos that increase knowledge, but also increase interest awareness of how science work, awareness of well maybe this is something I can do in the future. It’s really crucial to catch people at that pivotal moment in their life where they are quote unquote forced to actually they are forced to attend and educate to go to school, and we can catch them with something that actually sparks their interest. And moving on,
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah. So I think this nuance is important, and I appreciate you all just digging into that context setting situation, right? So we can understand what we’re dealing with. So Jay, the last time I ran into you in the fall, 2025, you were giving a poster presentation at the Research America session that they were hosting, and you had a really wonderful poster with some data on there, right? So I want to get into the actual intervention, as Chiara mentioned. This is an intervention, right? In a way, let’s talk about what actually is the intervention. So, what actually happens? So, if you can take us through snippets of, if you will.
So, for example, how often are these engagement, these demos that you’re hosting, right? And our students. able to are they signing up and have to show up every time or is it jump in jump off as you see please just give us some sense of what that intervention actually looks like in practice.
Jade Williams
Yeah, absolutely. So we kind of run our demo series on like a semester schedule. So if we’re looking at the past like spring like semester we have four demos so a monthly demo that focuses on a specific concept and it’ll be two days of demos within a week and it actually functions during their regular science class time so everybody gets to participate everyone is present, and it kind of supplements their regular like curriculum for that like two days, and we try to make sure that all of the sessions happen in the morning and the afternoon, so that all of those like students can kind of go through the full day and cycle, and then be prepared for the next day as.
Well, where there’s kind of a two-part component to that, and yeah, so another thing that we’ve been trying to really focus on is making sure that the demonstration concepts kind of line up with their scope and sequence for that quarter. So making sure that as best we can, that whatever concept we’re going to be doing the hands-on demonstration for. They’ve either are already learning that kind of around that same time of the quarter, or it’s coming up, so that they have some sort of base understanding or at least interest in what’s coming ahead, and kind of can more so apply the sort of active part of it to whatever lectures they had previously received.
Fanuel Muindi
I see, and Anagha, you’ve been doing this for a while. These demos yourself. Can you give us a sense? What is that like?
Anagha Krishnan
We just wrapped up our third full academic year of demos this particular year. So we’ve been doing this for essentially three full years, and so in the time we’ve done a whole slew of different types of demos that span different scientific topics, ranging from you know, we have biology demos where students get to look at you know plant and animal cells under the microscope. We have ecology demos where students have looked at a dogfish that was dissected, and students can identify the different organs within the dogfish, like understand their functions. We have an ecology demo where students get to do a little like insect petting zoo, like understanding the role that different organisms play within an ecosystem.
We do like physics demos where students have like built their own like magnetic speaker that they can like play music on. We like launch bottle rockets. We make ice cream. We’ve even recently done some like engineering demonstrations where students like build contraptions. We’ve done math demos where students learn about the arithmetic and algebra behind card tricks. And so, really, we what has been really wonderful about the program is that we really get to explore the full latent space of science and all the different topics and fields that exist within the space, and really give students a taste of all the different types of the diversity of things that one can do within science as a whole.
The other thing I would add on to what Jade said is that one of the things I learned being at the facility is that you know unlike being in a traditional classroom setting where you really have the same students for an entire academic year and you can really build off of concepts that you’re teaching in previous lectures. For us, our students we see them on the average stay for a young person at the facility is between one and six months, and so throughout the course of an academic year, and even throughout the course of a semester, we see a constant flux of students coming in and out. and so, a question that really arose early in the program was, well, how do we teach science such that no one is coming in feeling like they’re behind just because they hadn’t attended the previous demo, and so we have a very modular structure where each demo we do is stand alone and doesn’t like feed in or doesn’t require previous knowledge from any other demos.
It doesn’t require previous knowledge in terms of like prerequisite courses, and that’s really important because our students in one classroom can come from very different educational backgrounds. They might be in different grade levels in school. They might have had different academic experiences, different gaps in their education, and so really, each demo you come into it with no prerequisite knowledge necessary, and you leave with this introduction to one of a variety of different scientific topics, and I think that’s really exciting.
Fanuel Muindi
Now I can imagine you can track so many different things, Chiara, right? From this, and as Anagha mentioned, it’s challenging because students are not there continuously, right? You have them for a period of time. So could you give us a sense of what is trackable in this type of environment, right? That allows you to say, okay, we are making progress. We are making a difference.
Chiara Benetollo
Yeah, for sure. So, from the beginning, we have been really intentional about tracking as much as we can from this program, and so what we do is we do pre and post surveys within each demo, and we learn a couple of things through those students. Show that even attending one demo increases your interest in science, your knowledge of specific science, you know, topics, as well as your ability to really apply science to everyday life with statistical significance and to just give you an example of how that works, what we do is in the before we start a demo, we ask a number of questions that are subject specific.
So let’s say we it’s a demo on DNA. We would ask, well, do you know what else DNA? Other questions that are really specific to what we are going to be teaching. We also ask: Are you interested in science? Are you excited for this demo? So a mix of yeah questions that are really focused on the content and questions that get at: Are you? How do you feel about science, and we do see increases in across the spectrum, really in all of our demos, which to me it’s really important and interesting to see, like Anagha was saying, not just the growth in the knowledge, but also the growth in interest and the growth in understanding how does this apply to my life.
One thing that I’ve been thinking a lot lately is thinking about how do we develop STEM identities for and how do we support the youth in developing STEM identities for themselves? There is there’s scholarship out there showing that being good at science in terms of like just getting good grades in science is not necessarily the best predictor of having a career in STEM or majoring in STEM in college, what really is that best predictor is having a STEM identity, which is something that the youth who are incarcerated, marginalized, predominantly people of color, typically do not get the opportunity to develop. So we have data on what works, and we are also working on gathering more data to get more nuanced on how exactly does works.
Like, what are the mechanisms that enable us to get that to get those results,
Fanuel Muindi
And actually to go back, I’m thinking it’s been three years. I wonder what has changed in collecting that data. So to the collection part, right? What was it that you were tracking before? Maybe you stopped tracking. Maybe things that you have kept on tracking, right? So just the back end of that, not necessarily the actual data itself, but what has changed over time, and this is open to anybody.
Chiara Benetollo
Yeah, I will start answering that, and then I’m sure Anagha can further jump in. But one of the main changes that we are we have made in how we collect the data is materially. This is something that people don’t necessarily think about when they think about the challenges of doing education in spaces that are as constraints as carceral facilities. But one of the challenges that we have is that there is basically no technology that the students can directly access, and so any type of survey, any type of assessment that we do has to be paper for paper based, which then means you have to collect the forms that you have to transcribe them manually, and it takes a huge amount of labor.
And there’s also the you know you’re wasting time, precious time during those sessions, distributing papers, collecting them back, etc. So to address that, what we started doing in the last demos was having clickers, those old style clickers that you used to have in college classrooms before we all had a cell phone, and I’m collecting data that way so that we administer very similar questions. But we have seen greater participation among students because there are all sorts of ways in which you can gamify the experience of data collection, and so we get better data, and we don’t have to transcribe them, and we get them immediately, and that also enables us to respond more quickly to the student needs and what they want.
In terms of what hasn’t changed, really, what hasn’t changed is we. Have a lot of consistency in the gains that we measure along those three key areas: knowledge, interest in science, and ability to apply science to your life. We also have a lot of consistency. This is data that we collect often at the beginning of the year, we’ll do a focus group with students where we ask how do you like learning about science, and very consistently we get most students saying I like learning in a hands-on way, and then we ask, well, how often have you learned in a hands-on way, and most of them say never.
So that gap continues to be the need that we are addressing for the through the years.
Anagha Krishnan
I will say the only thing I will add on to that is so yeah, absolutely. Like when we first started the program, one of the big picture questions we asked students was, you know, how do you like to learn, and how have you learned before? And as Chiara mentioned, it’s definitely I like to learn hands on, but I’ve never learned science in a hands on way before. And something that has been cool to see change over the past couple of years is we’ll ask students you know have you done any have you had any hands on science experiences before and increasingly the answer is yes and when we ask them to elaborate on okay what was that experience the experience will have been a previous STEM Unbarred demo which I think is really exciting to see because it really tells us that for a lot of the students that we work with, this STEM Unbarred experience that they have is the very first time they’re having a hands-on science experience, and it’s really setting the stage for building that science identity that Chiara was talking about.
Fanuel Muindi
I was gonna, Jade. I’m curious. Is there a metric that you love to talk about to people with?
Jade Williams
I mean, I’m always very interested in all of it, and I’m always, you know, pleasantly surprised that like we’re kind of like meeting a lot of those areas that we are looking for, but I do think the kind of idea of the knowledge that can be gained within the space of like one demo is always really impressive to me. I feel like I have a background in English, and this whole program was very kind of unfamiliar to me, and just kind of seeing the structure and like back to that like modular sort of model of how accessible these demos are in terms of those actual like knowledge gains that students can make in that space is always really impressive to me, and something that I, as kind of doing the more like logistics, get to look at the lesson plans and feel that level of like accessibility for myself, where it’s like these are concepts I have never thought about or really studied, and kind of seeing how those could be translated in that space, where students can tangibly take away like, okay, this is now something that I know about this field that I think also then translates to a lot of those metrics around interests as well, and more like anecdotally, I feel like every time I’ve been in the like facility, students are always really excited that have previously participated to kind of tell you about that demo and like what they know from it, and kind of test that knowledge out as well.
So there is a real like tangible and like memory-based sort of gain from being able to like engage with the volunteers, and they’re always really excited to kind of like share those gains as well. Yeah.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah. And so Chiara, the knowledge gains that both Jade and Anagha mentioned come from the pre and post tests that you shared initially as well. I’m just curious, in a sense, like what specifically are you seeing? Can you just tell us a little bit more there in terms of those knowledge gains? Because I know they are tied to individual demos, right? And this is a challenge where the demos are changing because you some students are there in one thing, they’re not there again, right? Tell us a little bit more about that pre and post and these knowledge gains.
Chiara Benetollo
Yeah, absolutely. And so we have four like four answer multiple choice questions that we administer before student students start engaging in a demo and after they have completed the demo, and those questions really, you know, are based on what we know we will be talking about during the demo. So they may be about what is DNA, what do you know about ecology, you know, how does the heart work for our cardiology demo? So very broad but specific questions where there is a correct answer, and we just measure how many correct answers people give to those questions before and then after they have completed the demo.
And I have some data from a few of our you know just a few random demos. So, for example, for a physics demo, we saw an increase of 30% We saw an 30% increase in the number of correct responses in pre and post assessments, in a physiology demo, we saw 37% In the genetics, almost 50% 48% increase. So those are really meaningful increases in the number of questions that students get right before and after they have attended even a single demo.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, and you know numbers tell you one thing, right? I’m curious, what do what are students telling you directly, right? The conversations and Jade, you start talking about these anecdotes, right? Share more of these. Tell us the voices from the students. What are they saying?
Jade Williams
I will definitely let Anna jump in to this question as well because I feel like you spend a lot more time. But I will say I’ve always kind of got to be there in this like observational like capacity. So students are always really excited to kind of like tell me about the program because they’re always a little unsure, like unsure of what my presence is in the room, so it’s kind of this opportunity to be like a fly on the wall. And one of the last times I was there, a student was like specifically talking about like a neuroscience like demonstration and like how that is like a career field that she’s like really interested in.
And then there was a handful of students that kind of derailed that conversation, and they were joking about when was the next time we were going to do the ice cream one because two of them were missing for it. So it was nice to kind of see that through this sort of like catalog of demos that we have. Not only are the students that get to participate in multiple ones and kind of there for a bit longer of a period of time, it is our like consistency in the space is something that they look forward to as well. So they’re like, we know that this is a monthly thing.
What’s the next one going to be? And kind of knowing the structure of our program and kind of how it fits into their routine is always kind of impactful, as well as like, yeah, just the kind of specifics that they’re able to take from certain concepts, and they’re like, “Oh, I can translate those to a career or a field that I’m interested in, and that’s like what I want to major in. So, kind of those sort of stories are always-it’s something that obviously we are hoping to see. But I think, like you said, sometimes the numbers don’t reflect those like really specific sort of impacts, so that’s always really cool.
Fanuel Muindi
And Anagha, before you jump in, part of this like you need to also be there on site to see. And I love what you said. You were a fly on the wall, and they were approaching you. Actually, so you are the perfect person to answer that question. Like, what are they telling you, right? What are you hearing from all these voices as well?
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, I was gonna say totally agree with everything Jade has said. I will say, being in the instructor capacity, you know, when students tell me nice things, I’m like, are you telling me nice things? Because I’m the one teaching you. So it’s validating to hear that you know they’re telling people in an observational capacity as well. I was gonna say so when we started the program, one of the first goals, taking kind of a step back beyond goals of these knowledge gains, was just getting students excited about their science class, and I think that’s something that perhaps for many of the people in the audience who come from the science background, it’s something that’s easy to take for granted.
I think you know, like if you think about you know your average you know advanced high school science class, everyone in that science class is in that class because they want to be, and they’re in that class because they’re excited already about science, and the students we work with, some of them, all of them, really, are so brilliant. They pick up knowledge so quickly. It doesn’t surprise me that you know those scores go up. One of the first challenges we had with students was just getting them excited, getting them to want to engage in the course material, and so one of the very first goals and things we wanted to measure was just our students engaged in their science class.
Are they coming in like wanting to fully participate in the day’s activities? And that was something that I think has been so exciting to see, both in terms of data, both in terms of you know we quantum. The number of students who either you know fully participate in every aspect of the demo, partially participate in the demo, or you know tell us hey, like today’s not the day for this. Like I don’t want to participate in this activity, and we have seen those numbers go up tremendously. The number of students who want to fully engage in our court in whatever where the demo is that particular day, and then also I think anecdotally to kind of go from like you know us bringing stuff in and student like you know students are you know tired like don’t want to participate to now we like come in students recognize me they’re like what are we doing today and I think anecdotally being able to see that being able to have students at the end of a demo tell me like this was my favorite science class I’ve ever had, which we hear you know a little bit more after ice cream, but like after a lot of our demos.
Again, the ice cream demo is a demo we do to teach students chemistry through making ice cream, not just eating ice cream, but I think being able to see that complete 180 and how students feel about their science courses is really so heartwarming to see.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, I wonder what more do you wish to know because it’s difficult at times, right? This question is really about capacity at the end of the day, right? You’ve been talking about we curious if you can articulate the people who are doing the demos, these scientists you’re recruiting to come in and do the demos, or something else. But just think about capacity here. What else would you love to measure that you currently cannot, Chiara?
Chiara Benetollo
So many things, but I will go with a couple of them. First, a lot of people like Jade and Anagha have both said that students recall concepts from one demo to another, and we are not currently measuring any of that recall. But that is really important information that I do want to start measuring, And looking further ahead, in terms of longitudinal outcomes, I want to know what happens to those students after they are released, or if they’re not released, because some of those students have longer sentences and they will be transferred to adult facilities.
But do they remain engaged in STEM learning in different ways? Do they go on to have to major in STEM in college if they attend college, or do they even if they don’t like let’s say they go for an HVAC certificate that’s very math heavy? Is did they make the decision to go for that math heavy workforce development certificate in part because they learned that can be exciting and interesting, and not just you know a slug that you have to go through. So I think we are having our hypothesis, our assumption from what we hear from the students is that we are having an impact that lasts much longer than the individual demo.
But what we can measure right now are the impacts of one individual demo, and the barrier there it’s really I would say it’s really cost and capacity because tracking those longer term outcomes is requires a lot of labor and a lot of staff time. It’s you know notoriously hard to get those longer term outcomes for people in carceral facilities because it’s a highly transient population that doesn’t stay in the same facility for a very long time, and even worse, after they’re released, the last thing that they want to do is come back and talk about the time they spent inside and the impact that has had on their lives, they just want to move on, and so it’s possible.
It’s definitely possible to track those longer term outcomes, but it just takes a lot of staff time and capacity.
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, what I would add to what Chiara said is, so beyond having this sort of data to for the data’s sake and for the sake of validating our program, another I think really important aspect of collecting. This longitudinal outcomes data is for the purpose of building more programs to support students longitudinally, and I think one challenge we have now is I think at the beginning Chiara talked a little bit about you know there’s many challenges within the carceral space, but one opportunity within the carceral space is this opportunity to intervene in a positive capacity, and I think we’ve done that through STEM Unbarred. I hope the others on the panel agree.
But I think one of the things we want to do is how do we continue that intervention? How do we take students who are now excited about science, and when they are you know re-entering society, how do we continue to provide them with opportunities to push that passion for science and continue to build on it? And collecting some of that longitudinal data, I think, would really help inform some of these like reentry programs and ways for us to help maintain that interest and continue to push forward that interest in science. The other thing I was going to say, I think we didn’t fully touch on this, but the last aspect that we really try to measure in our program is this aspect of connecting science to the real world.
We really want students to step away from the demos, really understanding that science isn’t just something that you do in the classroom. It’s not just something you do in a lab, and it’s just done by you know people in white coats with like petri dishes. No, like science is something that touches every aspect of your daily lived life, and we really want students to come away with a sense of that, and so we design our demos very like with that in mind. And so a lot of our demos are built around student interests, built around bridging science with other topics. So as an example, I talked a little bit about a demonstration we designed to teach students about the math behind certain card tricks.
That demonstration was co-designed with students, and so what actually happened is, you know, we had students, you know, who liked to, you know, get to know volunteers and hang out with them. And so students had had come up to volunteers and said, “Hey, do you want to see this card trick? I know how to do. And volunteers, you know, when we saw that card trick, one of the volunteers was like, “Hey, do you know like there’s math behind that card trick? And that actually led to the development of this like math focused demo that was connected to an interest that students had, and so that is kind of one example of us bridging these demos like into the real world and in students’ interests, and we want to be able to continue that.
You know, when students like leave the facility, like really show them that you know science is a part of your everyday life, no matter what you choose to pursue as a career. Science will touch it in some capacity, and a lot of the kind of work we’re doing in terms of expansion is really focused on that aspect of our goals, that aspect of the program.
Fanuel Muindi
So this is a beautiful lead-in, and this was not planted, by the way. You talk about expansion. I’m like, yes, let’s talk about that, because essentially what you’ve done is three years. You’ve collected data. I’m assuming you feel confident that data is telling you it’s enough to expand. You have enough there to expand and do another experiment at another facility, because everything you’ve been talking about is at one facility in Washington, D.C. right, and you all nodding in the affirmative, so I’ll take that as yes. So now you want to expand, right? Petey Greene has sites all over the place. Tell me what is giving you that conviction, right? At the top of the list, right?
The things you want to measure, the things you have been measuring, but what is giving you that conviction? And keep in mind of the constraints you’ve been talking about, right? Chiara, you mentioned capacity, right? People, personnel. I wonder if volunteers are also part of that constraint. And I’m sorry, I’m throwing away so many questions in here, which is a classic mistake. But I want you guys to understand the context of which I’m asking this broader question of expansion, right? What are you really? What’s the foundation of that expansion, and why now, Chiara?
Chiara Benetollo
I think why now because, like you said, we have run this program for three years. In those three years, we have served more than 500 students. We have those very solid results that demonstrate its impact. And in those three years, we have also grown the program and codified it in a way where now we have a very solid. Curriculum of demos that have been tried and true that they’re tested. We actually spend a lot of time training our volunteers as well. We didn’t really talk as much about it, but you know our volunteers attend five hours of pre-service training just to introduce them to what does it mean to operate in a carceral state that is done across, you know, across all of the PGP programs and our regions beyond STEM Unbarred.
But then they also prepare for each demo, and we have a solidified, solid, solidified curriculum. We have a Google Classroom where they can go and learn what do they need to teach, and then we quiz them on the lesson plan. And we have developed all this infrastructure, which is what really has prepared us to scale those program in a way that maintains the quality of our service because I think sometimes the risk of scaling too fast is that you take something that is working very well at a localized in a localized way and if you haven’t done the work of building the infrastructure the next time you replicate it’s not going to work as well but I think now we’re really confident that we have that infrastructure, and it will work equally as well across other sides.
And like Anagha was saying, we are hoping to expand to other correctional facilities in DC and in our other regions. The PGP is a national organization. We have offices primarily in the northeastern U.S. and there are a lot of other correctional facilities that have, you know, where we do other types of programs that have heard about this and really want STEM demos. But we are also interested in bringing this into reentry and diversion spaces, so that we can catch students before they get sent into a carceral space, or after to continue to engage them and excite them.
Anagha Krishnan
In addition to kind of expanding kind of our program geographically, so to other sites, the other kind of thing that’s in the works for us is topical expansion. So expanding again, as I talked about, kind of expanding the way our curriculum is designed to focus on really practical, real world applications of science. And so one of the ways that we have been doing that, and this was actually based on student feedback, like to demos, is actually taking some of our biology demos and expanding them to focus on health literacy topics and health topics that affect students. And so this might be things like taking our genetics demo and adding a component to it that focuses on you know genetic underpinnings of disease, a topic that students have asked about at the end of the genetics demo, and part of what we’re doing to design that you know appropriately is we’re working with clinicians and residents and individuals at Johns Hopkins like School of Medicine to really kind of build out some of the scientific concepts that we have into their kind of health, like practical health applications of those topics, and so that will be one of the things we’re actually piloting for a few of our demos this fall, and we’re very excited about that.
And then also, I think I want to point out that as Chiara mentioned, the expansion that we do is a very thoughtful one. We really believe that you know STEM Unbarred is not a one size fits all program, and so when we think about expanding to new facilities, we do so you know very thoughtfully and very carefully. We spend a lot of time really understanding the unique needs of students at each facility because the needs of students at each facility are very different. I think Chiara mentioned, you know, diversion spaces and reentry spaces. The needs, the capabilities, like the capacity, all of that is different at each of those facilities.
And so we really do the work. Petey Greene really does the work to make sure that all of those, the needs, the goals, the differences are all really well understood before we deploy a program. And even though we have this, you know, very well packaged kind of system that is STEM Unbarred, it’s not a rigid system. It’s one that we that is flexible to meet the needs. Of whichever students and whoever we serve,
Fanuel Muindi
Because each population will be slightly different, right? Wherever where you deployed, so it sounds to me from what you’re saying, it is some customizations are needed. Actually, are necessary to be able to do that locally.
Chiara Benetollo
Yeah, absolutely. So the students are different, and also the conditions of the program are different. Even so, if we talk from facility to facility, there are facilities where we can bring in live insects, and there are facilities where we cannot even bring in a piece of rope or a cord, because that’s a safety concern. So each facility has very different material constraints, and if we are in an outside space, like in diversion or in reentry, the conditions will be different. In that students, it may be that instead of being during the period of a science class, it’s after school, and so students are self-selecting in a different way.
Or it could be that instead of you know having a full more than an hour for each session, we only have half an hour, 45 minutes. So really the conditions are varying, and what we do is we take our curriculum and the core pieces of the curriculum, but then we update it and adapt it as needed.
Fanuel Muindi
Could someone outside the Petey Greene network, let’s say a different carceral facility for youth, can they reach out to you say, Hey, I would love to have this program in our facility. Yes,
Chiara Benetollo
Yes, for sure. So we would love that. If anybody is listening and wants to reach out, please do. The PGP is currently in seven northeastern states, kind of along the east coast from Massachusetts to DC, so any facilities within those states we can likely reach because we already have regional offices in their facilities outside of those spaces. We can always talk. We can STEM Unbarred as a program that is fairly it’s fairly contained, and so it can be replicated in outside of our footprint. I will say the challenge is always funding. You will always hear me saying that because we can do everything with the right amount of funding, unfortunately.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, and you jump to my next question about funding. But before I do that, Jade, in terms of the volunteers, we haven’t spent enough time talking about the volunteers, who they are, and so forth. So you’re in the back, and you do see these logistics a little bit, and you’re building this sort of ecosystem of support, right? To make it as easy as possible for the volunteers to do this. Chiara, you were talking about the curriculum that is already there, right? Plug and play, almost for them, right? Can you tell us a little bit more, Jade, about these volunteers? Who are they?
Jade Williams
Yeah. So none of this would be possible without our amazing volunteers, and I will just say for STEM Unbarred, the volunteers’ level of investment and participation is beyond anything that we can ask for. They’re always coming up with new ideas and always giving such great feedback on what they’re actually seeing in the facility because we’re not always able to be there. So the relationship that we have with the STEM Unbarred volunteers is incredibly important, and yeah, they are all experts in their respective fields. We have a wide range of different STEM backgrounds, which makes it really great that students can kind of get this full spectrum of experts, kind of giving them that sort of larger context for some of these demonstrations.
And yeah, we pretty much keep like a group of 12 to 16 per semester, and everybody gets to kind of work in a team. So volunteers are always kind of working together and supporting each other, and making sure that they kind of run through all of the more like tricky like logistics before they get in with the students. And a lot of training time goes into it. A lot of yeah, just investment. But they do have this like pre-existing sort of support through the PGP, where any sort of materials or anything that they would need, we’re kind of always working together on that. And our yeah, our volunteers are definitely the kind of backbone of STEM Unbarred for sure,
Fanuel Muindi
But are they scientists? Are they tell us more about that?
Jade Williams
Yeah, so all of our volunteers are post bachelors in STEM fields. Most of the volunteers that we’ve traditionally kind of worked with for YSC have been from the NIH. So everybody’s kind of in their careers, working through their careers, doing that research kind of at the active moment, whether like volunteer, which is a really cool experience as well. But we are kind of broadening some of our recruitment and looking at different universities and kind of just trying to spread our network. And I know that Anagha can talk a bit more to kind of the impetus of where a lot of our volunteers sort of came from, because it was while you were in there as well.
But
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, so I think Jade really hit it on the head. So every volunteer that volunteers with us with STEM Unbarred has a bachelor’s degree in some STEM field, and it can be as diverse as you know public health to math to chemistry, like to psychology, etc. And the vast majority of our volunteers are, you know, actively have a career in a STEM field. So we have a lot of kind of graduate students, postdocs, industry. We have a few like industry professionals, and again across a huge diversity of STEM fields. And I think one of the really cool things about that is I always say our best demonstrations that we do have been designed by volunteers that are not me and not on the Petey Greene team.
It’s often someone who says, “Hey, like I have a background in immunology, and I want to design this demonstration to teach students about antibody-antigen interactions. Can I do that? And we say, “Absolutely! Like, tell us what you came up with, and then you know those demos go through kind of the same process that all of our demos do in terms of constructing a lesson plan, building learning objectives, developing these surveys, and then they get deployed. And I’m always amazed at just how amazing they are because there are these demonstrations that have been dreamed up by subject experts, like for our students, and that I mean, you can’t get any better than that.
I think so.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, I’m assuming also the volunteers will give you feedback on some of these demos, right? I think I know we mentioned earlier there was a demo. Some demos don’t make it out, right? Don’t survive essentially, right? You deploy them and you’re like, oopsie, that was that wasn’t great. Chiara, have you run into that? Some of those demos, and is it the volunteers that are telling you this? The students are seeing you getting all the data points to tell you know what? Let’s not do this anymore.
Chiara Benetollo
Yeah, we do debriefs. Jade actually does debriefs with all of our volunteers after each demo to gather their feedback. We also have pretty thorough tracking system that the PGP uses across our programs. Where after each session that you do, you as a volunteer you have to complete a form that tells us how long was the session, how many students did you work with, was the session successful, and how do you know? And so that is information that we take to understand how the sessions go, what happened, and what was effective. I will say that the demos that we have completely sunsetted are very few. What happens most of the time is well, there’s a nugget of like something that’s really interesting here, and let us fix the one part of the demo that was not as successful.
But by the time we deploy the demo, you know we’ve done a lot of work on the back end, so that I don’t think there are really demos that we are sunsetting in their entirety after we have deployed them, but we get a good sense of, well, you know, this experiment only works 50% of the times, and when it doesn’t work, you know, it gets frustrating for everybody that is involved. Let’s get something that’s a little bit easier that we are sure that will you know if you have to you know create the ice cream with the chemical reaction you gotta have the ice cream at the end otherwise people are gonna be very disappointed.
Fanuel Muindi
Of course, ice cream always works. Partnerships came out earlier, and this question now connects to funding. And my goodness, where did the time go? Time is going by so quickly. So unfortunately, we have to kind of slowly begin our way to closing. But all the things you’ve been talking about, I keep thinking about. It would be wonderful to have a partner, especially if I’m not going to talk about a student leaving the program, right? They leave the incarceration space and now out there. You would love to stay in touch somehow, to know sort of what happened to them, right? There, I can imagine a partner who is already in that space, right, connecting with you to.
Have that channel, right? To have a pipeline, if you will, almost of sorts, which then speaks to funding potentially, right? To have more people, right? Bring in new people. Jay joined the team, right? Not long ago, and many others. So, Chiara, I want to start with you. Can you speak to that? So, funding. You said it. You said you know you can’t talk enough about lack of funding. So I’m gonna give you here’s the thought experiment $100,000 tomorrow. You get this grant. Okay, what do you do with it first? It
Chiara Benetollo
Is such a great question. So the first thing that we do is hire someone. We have Jade on our team, courtesy of another grant that we have. That is not infinite and will at some point run out. And we very much want to still have Jade on our team. And so we are continuously fundraising to hire people to run this program, this means recruiting, like going out there, getting the volunteers, training them, supporting them throughout the duration of their engagement. Another thing that we would love to do is have more people on the backend that are doing the data analysis, which currently, you know, Anagha and I, with Jade support, are doing.
But to have a dedicated person who can work with the very rich data that we have put out some publications, put out some descriptions of the great success that we are having to make sure that others can also replicate those programs in their field, and the third and like really significant expense that we have is volunteer transportation. So we all of our facilitators are obviously volunteers, but we feel that it is really important for them to be reimbursed for their travel to and from facilities because otherwise, what happens is that you are selecting volunteers who are have the personal means to participate in those program, and you’re excluding the very type of people that we want to be volunteering in those spaces, and so we reimburse all of our volunteers for transportation expenses, and that quickly adds up.
Correctional facilities are typically in rural, remote areas, not by chance, but by design, because we want people who are incarcerated to be out of sight, out of mind, and that means that facilities are hard to reach. It takes a long time, and it takes money. We are lucky that the facility where we are currently offering the program is pretty close to the to this DC city center. But the next facility where we would like to bring this, it’s already in Maryland, in a rural area that is hard and expensive to reach. So those are some of our main costs. Since you mentioned partnership, we are very lucky to have a fantastic partnership with the school that operates inside the DC correctional facilities.
Maya Angelou Academy. It’s a chart it’s a charter school that operates in DC facilities as well as outside, and they support us by purchasing all the supplies. So again, that is a contribution that we get. If we want to replicate this in other facilities, we will try to have similar relationships with high schools. But not everybody has the means to get the supplies. So that is another really important cost that we would use our 100k for.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, I mean, for any funder listening, I mean, you just got a whole budget breakdown right there. Okay, if you were listening at the first part, go back, listen to that, and then this is the budget section of the grant. Okay, Anagha, you have some thoughts?
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah, I think in the past we’ve talked a lot about building funder practitioner university partnerships, and so I wanted to talk. I wanted to expand. I think Chiara did a really wonderful job, kind of highlighting, like what our needs are on the capital side. But in terms of kind of building partnerships, I think what we would really love to see is that three way partnership where we really. Are kind of the practitioner on the ground, like running this program, modifying the program like based on what the needs are. And I think on the university side, I mean, again, like a lot of our volunteer recruitment happens from universities and kind of academic organizations.
We also in the past have used our relationship with academia to help kind of design surveys and collect data in the most effective manner, and we want to kind of continue those partnerships to as especially as we think about collecting this longitudinal data. We want to make sure we’re collecting data as effectively and as accurately as possible, and then I think Chiara talked a lot about on the funder side, really kind of having the financial means to like put all of these like big ideas into practice because these big ideas like do need to be in practice, and then I think, kind of thinking about longitudinal past, like tracking and continuing longitudinal development of students.
Like, if you run a science program out there, which I imagine many of our listeners do, or are affiliated with a science education program, and you would like a referral. Like we want programs that we can refer students to, and say, “Are you really excited about you know this physics demo? Like here’s this amazing organization that does physics demos every week or every month. Like out in the community, when you know re-enter the community, go. Here’s who you should like get in touch with. We would love, I think, it would be such a boon for our students for us to be able to make those referrals for them.
Fanuel Muindi
Yeah, and this is why I love to do this because these nodes in the network, the nodes you’re talking about, Anagha, do exist. These programs that are out there doing some phenomenal work, and it’s a matter of connecting the dots, working together, right? Pull together some of our capacities to write grants. Sometimes you never need a grant, right? The funding is already there. You just need to strategically allocate those existing resources, right? To doing the work. But more funding is always appreciated, of course, right? Jade, in where is STEM Unbarred in two years from now. What would you like it to be in your mind?
Jade Williams
That is a great question. Yeah, I think one of the things that so I’m always getting contacted even internally or externally about such an interest, like I do feel like just hearing about our program alone, people are like, I see this gap at this facility. Like I’m working in this space. I see how this could fit in. So I think just being able to kind of, yeah, work on that type of expansion and kind of meet those needs because I do think this is such a singular and exciting program, and I think even if it looks different at other facilities, or if we’re kind of modifying it to work in reentry spaces, or just kind of building those partnerships where we can develop networks for students, where it’s like, okay, here is a continued way to engage in science.
I think just like widening that impact in some way, and what that looks like can be flexible. But I do think that the singularity of this program and kind of the way that it’s grown in the three years that it’s existed is something that I would like to see, you know, touching more students and kind of expanding in our different regions as well.
Fanuel Muindi
I don’t want to overreach. Also, maybe you guys might be around the tipping point, if you will. Right? You have all this data. Things are building. Right? Partnerships that may be in place. Chiara, what are you seeing two years from now? Where do you want STEM Unbarred to be?
Chiara Benetollo
I want STEM Unbarred to be in all of the youth facilities that are in the regions that the PGP currently serves, of which there are many. In Massachusetts, we are providing tutoring to all youth incarcerated across the states, and I want to bring STEM Unbarred to them as well. In Philadelphia, we are serving a number of youth facilities that have already asked for those programs. So that is step one. All of the youth facilities in the seven states where the PGP currently operates. Step two is diversion and reentry programs, especially for youth. There are a lot of diversion programs, rightly so. And sometimes it’s really hard to engage youth in education who have been sentenced to alternatives to incarceration.
And this type of program is a great way because it has an academic and educational context, but content, but it is also really exciting and engaging. So bring. bringing STEM Unbarred to all of the diversion programs that are in those states is my step two, and reentry as well, and then step three, which may or may not be within those two years, but one can dream, is going beyond our current footprint, like I was saying before, there is no reason why if a facility in Ohio is really interested in bringing this program to their students, why we cannot collaborate, and whether we are managing the program or whether we are supporting them in developing the program, we’re providing the curriculum, we’re providing the technical assistance, so that this can really reach, you know, all of the youth who are incarcerated across the U.
S. That’s my vision.
Fanuel Muindi
Wow, this is some big vision. So Anagha, you have some big shoes to fill here. So as we close out this conversation, Anagha, as the co-founder of this really wonderful initiative, you know, three years you’ve seen your baby, so to speak, grow and become and flourish. And you know, I’m not sure that they’re going to college right now. Maybe they’re going to middle school or high school. I don’t know how in your mind you’re seeing it. Can you set the stage for us so we’re having this conversation again? We’ll all meet again, okay, two to three years from now. Set the stage for us. What should we talk about at that conversation?
What would you like us to be talking about?
Anagha Krishnan
Yeah. So I think maybe kind of circling back. So at the very beginning of our conversation, you talked about how we had had a similar conversation, the two of us and Hannah about a year and a half ago, and I kind of look back and I said what’s changed, and I think one of the things we really worked on in the last year and a half was the depth of our programming was really like how can we turn STEM Unbarred into the best version of itself, and I think we really did that in the last year and a half. We really codified our demos.
We iterated on our demos based on feedback we got from students and volunteers. We iterated our demos based on kind of logistical hurdles that we have. So now we have this, we have this program. We have you know my baby that’s like the best version of itself. And what do you want to do with your baby when you have the best version of yourself? You want to show it to the whole world. You really want to expand and have that breadth. You want to have the breadth of let’s bring STEM Unbarred like to any facility that wants it and every facility that needs it and so I think Jade and Chiara really I think hit the mark like I hope in two years when we have this conversation or not even hope I intend that in two years when we have this conversation we’re telling you here’s what STEM Unbarred looks like in Philly.
Here’s what STEM Unbarred looks like in Massachusetts. Here’s what STEM Unbarred looks like on the West Coast at a facility that you know built it from the ground up based on our curriculum and the lessons that we learned. I think that would be, yeah, the dream is you know all these iterations of STEM Unbarred in these unique facilities that really then allow us to take the data we feel so confident about at in DC at the Youth Services Center and say here’s what that here’s how that data generalizes to youth carceral facilities across the country.
Chiara Benetollo
Anagha, you touched on the data point. We have amassed a significant amount of really promising data, and we are working on publishing the results from the analysis of those first three years, and so that’s another area where we really want to invest in the coming year. Not just doing the work, but also doing the research on the work and sharing it with others so that others can see what is possible. Others can replicate it, and there is really not that much on very little research on. STEM programming in youth carceral facilities. To the extent that research has been done on STEM programming in carceral facilities, it has been about adults, and to the extent that research has been done about youth, it has been about youth outside carceral facilities.
So this is really an understudied area where we don’t know enough about what works and why it works, and that’s a gap that I think we are intending to fill.
Fanuel Muindi
Wow! Wow! You’ve hit so many nodes in here, right? A scholar listening to this is like, oh my goodness, I want to help you with this data analysis, for example, right? Because I’ve been thinking about these questions too. They should reach out. I’m thinking about a funder who’s thinking, “Wait a minute, I can help fund some of these expansion, right? They should reach out, right? Last time, Anagha, we were chatting. You did not have a website, by the way, right? And now there is actually a fully fledged website under the PGP program, and I presume that will only continue to grow with old sorts of nuggets and data.
Chiara, data person, sharing that those insights out there. I really loved earlier, Jade. You talked about imagination when you talk about this program, and suddenly you open up people’s imagination of what’s possible in that space, right? Programming that you can now do, like, wait, you guys are there doing this? How? Where? When? And we kind of went through that in our conversation. And I would even argue that’s probably the tip of the iceberg that we talked about, right? In the last hour, time flew, and so there is so much to I think uncover the past year and a half, two years, and Aga, a lot of progress, and I’m excited to keep track.
And you’re always welcome to come back, share new insights. This paper of yours, Chiara, that you’re going to publish, we would love to talk about it when it comes out and really dig into those numbers. I tried a little bit here, but really dig in next time. But I want to thank you all for taking the time. Oh, another point, Anagha. We have more people this time, right? Having this conversation, right? So next time, even more people, and better yet, in person, right? That would be absolutely amazing. So thank you to the three of you. I really appreciate you taking the time.
Chiara Benetollo
Thank you so much for having us. It was a real pleasure to have those conversation, and I look forward to the next one. Thank you so much.
Anagha Krishnan
Thank you.
Fanuel Muindi is a former neuroscientist turned civic science archivist and documentarian. He is a professor of the practice in the Department of Communication Studies within the College of Arts, Media, and Design at Northeastern University, where he leads the Civic Science Media Lab. Dr. Muindi received his Bachelor’s degree in Biology and PhD in Organismal Biology from Morehouse College and Stanford University, respectively. He completed his postdoctoral training at MIT.
Contact
Menu
Designed with WordPress

