Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Why I Sci

CSM Lab

Published

on

by Natalie Hamer | Biomedical Science Student at Newcastle University |

[dropcap]M[/dropcap]y favorite question has always been ‘why?’ As a child, this question frustrated my mother to no end. I asked her a million questions, and interrogated all of her answers. When I wasn’t demanding to know ‘why’, I could often be found with my head in a book trying to absorb as much knowledge as possible. But it was never enough.  The more I learned, the more I needed to know. Naturally, this led me to the world of science. I was fascinated by how every cell in our body has the same set of instructions yet some form skin cells whilst others become red blood cells. I was amazed that the sun is a burning ball of gas held together by its own gravity, yet somehow it provides the energy we need to generate all life on Earth. These amazing concepts seemed too big to comprehend. Yet, instead of shying away from them, I dove right in and readily accepted the challenges they posed.

It would be easy to believe that a career in medicine was an obvious choice for me.  Unfortunately, this was not the case. In high school, I was labelled as a ‘geek’. Between this and my love of science, I was pushed towards a career in medicine. Don’t get me wrong, the idea of being good enough to get into medical school appealed to me and after some little persuasion, I threw myself into this new challenge. The more I got into it, the more people expected me to go off and become a medical doctor. I fell down a rabbit hole where I felt that this one decision had defined me. As such, I ignored all the signs that maybe medicine wasn’t for me. For starters, I’d always had a crushing fear of needles (a great quality for a doctor I know). Moreover, the more I learned about medicine, the more I realized that I preferred the science behind the medicine instead of the clinic. Despite this, I kept my doubts to myself and plodded along with my medical school applications and interviews (in the UK, students can apply to medical training programs immediately after high school), too afraid to let my parents or my teachers down. These people had supported me and believed in me. I felt like a fraud saying I had made a mistake… That was until results day.

Explore Next:  Learning to Know Myself

A friend of mine had applied to study a bachelor’s degree in biomedical sciences and was delighted to accept her admission. When I asked her why she’d chosen a degree in science, a field where the public often overlook all your hard work and great discoveries, she told me this:

“As a medical doctor, I may help a few hundred people over my life time. But as a scientist, my discoveries could change the lives of billions.” 

It’s funny how a simple sentence can change the course of your entire life. But her words did just that. Abandoning my plans to go to medical school, I also accepted a bachelor’s of biomedical sciences from Newcastle University and three years on, I can honestly say it’s the best decision I’ve ever made. Every day I get to follow my passion and delve into all the intricacies of the human body. The best thing for me is that learning never ceases.  There’s always more to know and more questions to be answered. I currently work at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) trying to develop cures for certain auto-immune diseases but next year I plan to take on a new challenge, the PhD.

A huge part of my science journey has also been in science communication. I am saddened that too much of the extraordinary research going on in the world rarely makes it to the eyes of the masses.  This is something that I want to change. With that in mind, I put a lot of effort in making all the exciting science research that continually amazes me more accessible to everyday people. It doesn’t matter how great your research is if it never leaves the lab or is trapped behind a wall of inaccessible jargon. In my eyes, great science and public engagement go hand in hand. Who wouldn’t want to share their passion with the world? At the moment, I do this through my blog, www.scishot.wordpress.com, and this is something that I hope to continue wherever my career in science may take me. Who knows? Maybe one day, I’ll inspire someone else to become a scientist just like my friend inspired me.

Featured Image is by Qimono from Pixabay | Image is titled “Question Mark” | CC0 Public Domain

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  My Stolen Identity: I Was Told That Science Was Not Meant For Me

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending