Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Undeterred: My Journey Continues

Lauren Neal: “Representation in science is of the utmost importance to me at this point in my life. I hope to contribute to changing the idea of what a scientist is supposed to look like or where they are supposed to come from.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Lauren Neal

[su_boxbox title=”About”]Lauren Neal is currently a rising senior at Agnes Scott College pursuing a BS in Neuroscience with a minor in Chemistry and will be graduating in May 2020. Although she is still early in her scientific career, she strongly believes that the experiences sheโ€™s had so far have been imperative in guiding her to where she is today. The story below was edited byย Emily Sherman.[/su_boxbox]

[dropcap]I[/dropcap] grew up in the southwest suburbs of Chicago, Illinois, with an architect father, a mother who works in communications, and a younger sister that is currently an aspiring artist. I have been fascinated with figuring out how the world for as long as I can remember, whether it be in terms of life sciences, archaeology, or medicine. As a child I remember asking my mom and dad for space-themed puzzles, childrenโ€™s fossil digging kits, a โ€œmicroscopeโ€ camera that could attach to my television, and, my personal favorite, a forensics kit that allowed you to dust objects for fingerprints so I could solve imaginary crimes in my house all day. I knew from a young age that I wanted to be in a field that allowed me to use my hands, and ultimately discover something.

In high school I immersed myself in science classes. Once, I even begged the administration to allow me to take three science classes in one year. I was excelling and knew that I had a lot of potential to be great in the future. During my junior year of high school, I took an Anatomy and Physiology course (to prepare for medical school, of course). I discovered the magic that is the human nervous system, and neuroscience in particular. I immediately knew it was the field for me, since I always had an interest in psychology and behavior, but also wanted the hands-on experiences I was getting in my biology and chemistry classes. I could combine these interests in the field of neuroscience. I began to read journal articles so I could learn as much as I could before applying to college the following year. Although I understood very little of the content, I knew it was something I wanted to understand in the future.

I was determined to attend a small liberal arts college with an intended major in neuroscience. During one meeting, I excitedly brought my idea to my high school college counselor, who had always been supportive of me. But then she said the following:

You should do something easier. Neuroscience is not for you.

She went on to tell me that only valedictorians go on to pursue neuroscience, and that I would probably drop out my first semester if I even tried. I will never forget those words. I was floored. My grades were top notch, and I never gave anyone any reason to think that I was incapable of pursuing my dreams. I found myself questioning why it was that she felt so strongly about this.

Explore Next:  #PhDart - How Does Evolution Give Rise to New Behaviors?

As a young black woman, I now understand what lead her to make those conclusions about me and my future. There are very few people who look like me in STEM. I am sure she did not know of any scientists of color. It was probably difficult for her to visualize me in that role, which is a sad but unfortunately true reality.

I did not let her deter me, and I stuck to my original plan. College has been a completely life-changing experience for me. I came into college intending to pursue medicine. However, during my first summer, I was awarded the opportunity to conduct research in a summer program sponsored by my college. This project focused on annotating Drosophila genus genes in bioinformatics software. It was exciting not knowing what I would find. For the first time, I was not in a lab associated with a course where the answers are already determined.

I hope to contribute to changing the idea of what a scientist is supposed to look like or where they are supposed to come from.

I currently am participating in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Exceptional Research Opportunities Program. Through this program I have been doing neuroscience research in the Hobert Lab at Columbia University for the past two summers. This experience combined with presenting at the Annual Society for Neuroscience Conference made the decide to pursue a strictly research-based career, no longer pursuing medicine.

I will be applying to neuroscience PhD programs this upcoming semester. I hope to do research on the cellular mechanisms behind a number of conditions that affect the nervous system. I intend on having my own lab in the future, where I will be able to help the next generation of scientists develop and hone their skills. The mentors I have had thus far have helped me immensely and have allowed me to grow my own skills, so paying that forward in the future is a goal of mine. Representation in science is of the utmost importance to me at this point in my life. I hope to contribute to changing the idea of what a scientist is supposed to look like or where they are supposed to come from.

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  My Career in the Midst of a Pandemic: Overcoming the Limitations of COVID-19

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending