Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

My Unconventional yet Common Science Career Path

Science is an experience! Once you have tasted it, it is tough to let go!

CSM Lab

Published

on

Lakshmi Ramachandran, PhD

[su_boxbox title=”About” box_color=”#262733″]Dr. Lakshmi Ramachandran works in Science Communications at the Mechanobiology Institute (MBI), National University of Singapore. Prior to this she worked in early drug discovery research at Astrazeneca India after obtaining a PhD in Cell and Molecular Biology from SUNY Buffalo. ย Today, she is focused on enabling better female participation in both STEM education and careers. She is a member of the MBI women in science organization (@MBIWIS) and has been part of international symposiums, such as the Gender Summit and the UNESCO symposium, which addressed female participation in STEM education and STEM careers. She is a mother of two young boys, has a unique memoir-cookbook (Roomies/Foodies) to her credit, and writes poetry in her leisure time.ย [/su_boxbox]

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]hree years ago, I got involved in the activities of a voluntary โ€˜Women In Scienceโ€™ (WIS) group where I work within the Mechanobiology Institute (MBI), National University of Singapore (NUS). I joined WIS because I wanted to benefit from being in a support group, and in the process, I had the opportunity to support my fellow women in the field of science.ย 

This is when I began to gain awareness on the complex issues faced by women in science and was amazed to see how much I could relate to many of these.ย  The awareness also helped me understand what went behind some of my decisions that impacted my career path in science, and provided me with the knowledge to look at similar situations in my life today, in a different light.ย 

My career path has been unconventional on one hand, and yet, common on the other. It is unconventional because I have changed track twice – once from academia into pharma and then, into science communications, and all this was with a career break in between! Ironically my career path is also common because it falls in the category of 35% of women who drop out of science careers following their PhD or a postdoc.ย 

Lakshmi Ramachandran

This phenomenon is known as the โ€˜leaky career pipeโ€™, where women drop out of STEM careers at a high rate at earlier time points in their career cycle. Unfortunately, this leads to a loss of talented and skilled women in science, and consequently high under-representation of women at the independent investigator and leadership levels.ย 

The โ€˜leaky career pipeโ€™ coincides with the challenges of balancing work and family, and this often becomes a major issue post motherhood. In my case, I had full support, both from my family and my wonderful employers at Astrazeneca India, to stay on the career track while pursuing a family.

But the emotional distress from infertility treatments had left me with a dissatisfactory feeling of not being able to give my 100% at work and in personal life. Despite advice from the wise that โ€œlife is not to be taken as piecemealโ€, I felt I needed to focus on one thing at a time. I quit my career based on a thought that my biological clock will not wait, but my career will!

I cannot emphasize enough on the role of good mentoring in enabling women to retain or excel in science careers.

However, when I wanted to get back to science after settling my personal matters, it wasnโ€™t easy! I recall sending application after application for research positions both within and outside of my research area to get back to science. The rejections and lack of response did leave me feeling desperate. But I often told myself that it is only a matter of time. I continued to pursue my job hunt with persistence and focused on staying positive and healthy throughout the process. Fortunately, I was working on a memoir-cookbook with a friend from the PhD studies, and the writing and publishing of โ€˜Roomies/Foodiesโ€™ during this period not only gave me something to do, but also presented me with exciting moments and a sense of accomplishment.

Explore Next:  Discovering My Passion for Teaching

When I realized that updating my skill sets was imperative to moving forward, I enrolled for courses such as molecular diagnostics and looked at alternate careers that best suited my inherent skills and passion, such as teaching and science communications. I waited patiently while networking and keeping myself updated on the latest in science. Much later, I landed my present job in science communications at MBI, which presented me with a breath of fresh air, for not only could I get back to science in a new and exciting capacity, but it also helped rekindle my aspirations.

Additionally, through my involvement in MBI-WIS, I got to know of the complex problems leading to the โ€˜leaky career pipeโ€™ of women researchers. Awareness on some of these problems, such as lack of self-confidence in taking on higher responsibilities and inadequate networking, helped me revisit these aspects in my life and work on it.ย  I see the โ€˜leaky career pipeโ€™ as a multilayer problem that involves the individual, family, society, institutions and governments.

For the same reason, this needs to be tackled at multiple levels, encompassing grassroots level as well as political level. I cannot emphasize enough on the role of good mentoring in enabling women to retain or excel in science careers, by compassionate people (not just successful researchers), as I have been a beneficiary of it, thanks to Prof. Linda Kenney (Professor and WIS lead at MBI).

Although I have no regrets in the way my personal and professional lives have shaped together, today I share a different perspective on โ€˜quittingโ€™. I now know that challenges in life come and go, including the initial challenges of motherhood. It is a transient phase that tides over just like any other. Most importantly, acknowledging that a human being cannot give his/her 100% in all aspects of life at all times helps remove significant mental burden and enables one to hang in there without taking oneself out of the game. I emphasize on this because, once you are out of the game, it may take tremendous efforts, resilience, and adaptability to put oneself back!ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

Science is an experience! Once you have tasted it, it is tough to let go!ย 

I was just fifteen when I decided to become a scientist. I had a burning ambition to become a drug discovery researcher that arose from my fascination for science, mainly in understanding the biology and genetics of cells and microbes. I was undeterred, came out with flying colors and entered my desired career path – that of a drug discovery researcher. Yet, at one point, I left science because I felt then that family and science were incompatible!

Today, I have proved myself wrong by getting back into science – after becoming a mother of two – while balancing my life, work and social involvement. All of this owing to my undying passion for science!

Cover Image is from Pixabay |ย CC0 Creative Commons

[su_boxbutton url=”https://storiesinscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Ramachandran_Stories-in-Science-DOI.pdf” target=”blank” style=”flat” background=”#000000″ color=”#ffffff” size=”5″]Download the Story[/su_boxbutton]

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Love The Path You Travel

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending