Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Two Steps Forward, One Step Back

CSM Lab

Published

on

Edritz Javelosa – 

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he luscious vegetation, crawling critters, warm beaches, and the tropical climate of the Philippines – an archipelago with more than 7,000 islands, tons of natural resources, and a wide range of biodiversity – was the setting to my childhood upbringing. Growing up in an area surrounded by nature was one of the many reasons that ignited my interest in science. My adventurous spirit to discover and learn continued to grow from childhood to adulthood, and who would have thought I would become a scientist.

I was 14 years old when I arrived in the United States. Despite migrating to the U.S., there was still a big push for me to become a nurse because this is a common career choice for many Filipinas. However, I decided to go against the trend and immersed myself into the realm of science. Coming from a low-income background, my choice to attend a major university created concerns for me and my family. Nonetheless, I enrolled at the University of Arizona and majored in Molecular and Cell Biology.

I became the first in my family to earn a college degree and later to attend graduate school. As a first-generation student, I have set myself up for high expectations

Edritz Javelosa

coming from my family and myself. This has created an immense amount of pressure. But there is also a lot of pride because I have achieved this important milestone in my life. 

While my success has changed my parents’ view about my career choice, my path is uncommon among Filipinas. This is partly due to the lack of role models. In all my time at two large universities (University of Arizona and Stanford), I have not met a single Filipina faculty member in a STEM field. 

My goals in life are constantly evolving, which is terrifying, but also simultaneously exciting. 

At the University of Arizona, I came across the Ronald E. McNair Program for underrepresented students. Applying to and becoming a McNair scholar was a pivotal point for me. Through the McNair program, I found a research position in the lab of Professor Tsu-Shuen Tsao where I worked on the effects of AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) α on the stability of erythropoietin (a substance that promotes the production of red blood cells). This was truly my first real immersion to research in biology and a confirmation that being a scientist was what I wanted to pursue.

Explore Next:  Better Get Used to Me

The following year, the McNair program funded my 2011 summer internship at Stanford University where I worked with Professors Craig Garner and Richard Reimer characterizing novel lysosomal markers. Why? We wanted to use the markers to map out the movement of the lysosomes in neurons.

My summer experience at Stanford gave me the confidence to succeed as a graduate student in a program of the highest caliber, which was key to my decision to apply for the Neuroscience PhD Program at Stanford. Currently, I am working in Dr. Richard Reimer’s lab exploring the effects zinc interaction with a protein and how this contributes to Parkinson disease.

When I am not doing bench work, I participate in activities advocating STEM to first-generation and/or low-income students. From my own experience being in this field for ten years, there is a need for an increase in the diversity and inclusion in academia and industry.

As a Filipino woman in a STEM PhD program, I have yet to meet an ethnic and gender matched role model, which is partly the reason that has instilled in me a strong commitment to enhancing diversity in STEM to benefit others who have backgrounds similar to mine through teaching and mentoring. My years at Stanford have given me opportunities to be involved in programs where I can give guidance, support, and be a role model to the next generation of bright scholars from non-traditional backgrounds.

In this world I learn about cool, different, odd, and new things everyday either in science, education, technology, art, etc. The curiosity that I had as a child never left. Instead it only grew and made me eager to see, taste, smell, hear, touch, and learn from all of those experiences. My goals in life are constantly evolving, which is terrifying, but also simultaneously exciting. 

As I finish my last year at Stanford, I plan to take courses that are outside of my field and continue my involvement in education outreach. I eagerly anticipate building more knowledge of the world and to life fulfilling adventures as I continue to develop to grow as an individual, a scientist, and a mentor. I encourage everyone to discover what s/he values, be curious and ask questions, and create your own adventure.

Edritz Javelosa is a graduate student in the Neuroscience Program at Stanford University.  Cover image is by Sonorax from Pixabay | CC0 Creative Commons 

 

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Art and Design Meets Science: A Reflective Conversation on Science Communication

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending