Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

The Talk of The Sea

Aiza Kabeer: “Our traditional understanding of human exploration is incomplete without Polynesian navigation.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Aiza Kabeer

[su_boxbox title=”About”]The story below is part of the Scientific Tradition (SciT) project from the STEM Advocacy Institute (SAi). My hope is that eventually this collection of stories will serve as an introductory resource to fill in the gap we have in science history, and benefit those who might not otherwise have found inspiration in the past. Stay tuned as we slowly but surely build a database that will present an alternative view of science history. Learn more about the project HERE. The story below was edited by Jessica Tsai and Katelyn Comeau.[/su_boxbox]

โ€œIf you can read the ocean, you will never be lost.โ€ – Mau Piailug, Master Navigator

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f I were to ask you about the history of navigation and exploration by sea, what comes to mind? Maybe you think of Ferdinand Magellan. Or, you might recite โ€œIn 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blueโ€. Most likely, the image that comes to your mind is of European navigation. But what if navigation was not just a feat accomplished by Europeans?

One of the indigenous groups of Polynesia, the Maori, call Ui Te Rangiora the greatest of navigators. He is described to have traveled so far that he saw โ€œthose wonderful things:โ€”the rocks that grow out of the sea, in the space โ€ฆ the female that dwells in those mountainous waves, whose tresses wave about in the waters and on the surface of the sea; … Other things are like rocks, whose summits pierce the skies, they are completely bare and without any vegetation on them.โ€ Perhaps the tresses of the female are kelp (which can be over 50ft long), and the bare rocks were icebergs. As legend would have it, Ui Te Rangiora had reached the seas of Antarctica, as early as the 7th century.3

Polynesia is a triangular area with corners at the Hawaiian Islands, Aotearoa (New Zealand), and Rapanui (Easter Island).1 ย Over many millennia prior to colonization, the people in this region of the world maintained a complex civilization and migrated across the Pacific Ocean in canoes. The Polynesian people were experts in navigation and they achieved incredible feats.2

The vessels that the indigienous Polynesian peoples used to sail were central to their existence. Smaller vessels that could be paddled by one or two people were used for inland or fishing journeys. But longer canoes, of up to 100 feet, had speeds comparable to European sailing ships. With a favorable wind, Polynesian voyaging canoes could travel more than 100 miles in a day.2

To put things into perspective, the Polynesian people sailed in canoes, with no modern sailing technologies or maps, while exploring thousands of miles across the Pacific.4

Whether or not Ui Te Rangiora truly reached the Arctic Seas, the Polynesians’ explorations in the Pacific were a feat that required keen observation of the world around them. Beyond exploration, the Polynesians settled all over the Pacific. They didnโ€™t just travel to an island once, they traveled back and forth among them all.5

The technology of the canoe alone would not be enough to navigate thousands of miles of the Pacific. Understanding the locations and trajectories of the stars was key to navigation (stars rise in the east and set in the west, and when one star rises too high to be useful, another may follow itโ€™s trajectory). In the daytime, the sun could also serve as an aid. Observing currents, winds and swells (they can give an idea of far off wind patterns) also provided directional information. These methods required the navigator to keep a running account of a journeyโ€™s progress, meaning they could not sleep very much.2

Explore Next:  Science - A Poem

There were also specific methods used to find land. For example, observing the flight pattern of birds could indicate land, as could reflected waves (as opposed to those caused by wind) and the locations of clouds (which tended to cluster around island peaks, or could have a greenish tint due to atolls and expansive coral reefs).2

These descriptions merely graze the surface of an intricately developed tradition that allowed the Polynesians to settle almost every inhabitable island in the Pacific.4 Imagine sailing hundreds of miles in open sea, without any modern aides. Though some have posited that this was simply possible by accident, there is evidence showing it was intentional. Voyages made by Micronesians on the order of hundreds of miles using similar methods have been documented. Computer simulations of the direction of Polynesian settlement (west to east, against the wind) also show it was not an accident.2

It is an awe inspiring achievement, but the west was surprised, and sometimes doubtful, of the accomplishments of a culture with seemingly few resources.5 Of course western superiority is a part of that. But it is important to note that science is a language of many times and places, employed in different ways to suit different needs. And that is important – scientific thought doesnโ€™t always occur in the western framework we perceive it to belong to.

The Hokuleโ€™a voyaging canoe, image courtesy of Waka moana.

Today, the ancient practice of Polynesian wayfinding has been revived. As of 2017, the voyaging canoe, Hokuleโ€™a, completed a 3 year sailing journey across the world. Using traditional polynesian navigation methods, the journey covered 40,300 nautical miles. Not only was it a technological feat, but a cultural milestone.6 Nainoa Thompson, captain of the vessel, was taught by master navigator Mau Piailung in a tradition that comes across as equally spiritual and scientific.

Mau shared knowledge of what he called โ€œthe talk of the seaโ€. For example, he could lie in the hull and identify the waves hitting the vessel, and from that he knew the direction of the wind and how to steer the canoe.7 It seems almost too ethereal to be a scientific endeavor. Yet, it is observation of the patterns of the earth that allowed Polynesian navigators to succeed, and that is indeed science. 7

When we think of navigation and exploration, do we remember the Polynesians? Or have we forgotten the extraordinary achievements of people who do not belong to the status quo? Our traditional understanding of human exploration is incomplete without Polynesian navigation. When we lose historical stories such as these, we forget that scientific thought exists outside the western framework we believe it belongs to.

References:

  1. Martins K. Polynesian Navigation & Settlement of the PacificAugust 7 2020. Available from: https://www.ancient.eu/article/1586/polynesian-navigation–settlement-of-the-pacific/.
  2. Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures. Second edition. ed. Berlin ;: Springer; 2008.
  3. Smith SP. Hawaiki: The Original Home of the Maori, With a Sketch of Polynesian History. Christchurch, NZ: Whitcombe and Tombs Limited; 1904. Available from: http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-SmiHawa-t1-body-d7-d8.html.
  4. Harris R. The Art of Navigation. Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine [Internet]. December 2007. Available from: http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/art-navigation.
  5. Powell A. The history and mystery of Polynesian navigation2020. Available from: https://phys.org/news/2019-03-history-mystery-polynesian.html.
  6. Gray J. Voyaging canoe returns to Hawaii after three-year trip across the globeJune 17 2017 2020. Available from: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/voyaging-canoe-returns-hawaii.
  7. Allen J, Bilderback J. Mฤlama Honua: Hลkลซleสปaโ€™s Voyage of Hope – Patagonia2016 2016-04-14. Available from: https://www.patagonia.com/stories/malama-honua-hokule%ca%bbas-voyage-of-hope/story-29586.html.

The above image of Theย Hokuleโ€™a voyaging canoe is courtesy of Waka moana, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Building My Research Lab in India

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending