Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

The Faith of A Physicist

Aiza Kabeer: “Though this is a brief overview, Abdus Salam’s life gives us a sad, yet rich and inspiring story of a talented scientist deeply rooted in a religious and cultural identity.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Aiza Kabeer

[su_boxbox title=”About”]The story below is part of the Scientific Tradition (SciT) project from the STEM Advocacy Institute (SAi). My hope is that eventually this collection of stories will serve as an introductory resource to fill in the gap we have in science history, and benefit those who might not otherwise have found inspiration in the past. Stay tuned as we slowly but surely build a database that will present an alternative view of science history. Learn more about the project HERE. Cover image by Bart Molendijk / Anefo. The story below was edited by Katelyn Comeau.[/su_boxbox]

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]n 1979, the Nobel Prize in Physics was shared among three men for their work on unified weak and electromagnetic interactions of elementary particles. Those three men were Sheldon Lee Glashow, Steven Weingberg, and Abdus Salam2, but one was not like the others. In a room full of men in black suits, Abdus Salam accepted his prize wearing a turban and shalwar*.3 

Abdus Salam was born in a small village in Punjab, India (present day Pakistan) where electricity was not readily accessible. He attended an urdu-medium school, where English was not the main language of instruction. Despite his humble background, Salam was academically gifted, and excelled in physics and mathematics. Eventually, through a scholarship fund set up by the Minister of Punjab, he was able to study at the University of Cambridge in 1946.2

“This in effect is the faith of all physicists; the deeper we seek, the more is our wonder excited, the more is the dazzlement for our gaze.” 

Abdus Salam, December 10th 19791

Abdus Salam’s research in electroweak theory is what led him to the Nobel Prize.4 The standard model in physics describes elementary particles, the smallest building block of matter. These particles interact in three different forces – electromagnetism, strong interactions, and weak interactions, which in combination hold subatomic particles together and allow atoms to interact with other atoms. In electroweak theory electromagnetic and weak forces are combined into one, and this theory laid the foundations for important breakthroughs in physics down the road such as the discovery of the Higgs Boson particle.

This was not Salam’s only major contribution to science, though. He also developed the theory of the neutrino and had no shortage of new hypotheses to pursue.5 He even had ideas that others rejected, but eventually turned out to be valuable. For example, Salam had written to prominent physicist, Wolfgang Pauli, of his thoughts about testing parity, but Pauli discouraged him from pursuing them.3 In physics, a parity transformation on a system is when the spatial coordinates of that system are flipped (think of a mirror image of sorts). If the system remains unchanged after the transformation, it is said that the parity is conserved. Until the 1950s, physicists believed that when a fundamental system of particles interacts, parity remains the same.6 Salam believed that this was not always the case. Because of Pauli’s advice, Salam never published his ideas. Eventually, two Chinese physicists ended up receiving the Nobel Prize for the same concept.3

Like Ramanujan (a famous mathematician from the Indian subcontinent), Abdus Salam was not like other famous scientists of his time. He came from a modest background and was a religious man, an Ahmadi Muslim. He was what we do not perceive scientists to be today, both religiously devout and scientifically accomplished. He claimed to have ‘flashes’ of scientific thought, and he would listen to recitations of the Quran as he worked on scientific problems.3 When he accepted the Nobel Prize, he quoted the Quran saying, “In the Holy Book of Islam, Allah says ‘Thou seest not, in the creation of the All-merciful any imperfection, Return thy gaze, seest thou any fissure. Then Return thy gaze, again and again. Thy gaze, Comes back to thee dazzled, aweary.’ 

Explore Next:  Breaking the surface: Lessons on resilience and rebuilding from planarians

This in effect is, the faith of all physicists; the deeper we seek, the more is our wonder excited, the more is the dazzlement for our gaze.”1

A minority among the great scientists of his time, he was also a religious minority in his home country of Pakistan. As a result of socio-political machinations, the Ahmadi sect is not recognized as Muslim by the Pakistani government. Due to the denomination, the sect has faced many hardships.3  Still today, the word ‘Muslim’ has been whitened off of Abdus Salam’s tombstone.5

Even so, his support for the advancement of science in his country, and the developing world at large, was unwavering. He believed strongly in the need to provide equal opportunities to those in the developing world. To this end, he founded the ICTP (International Centre for Theoretical Physics). It still exists today, and was founded with a global vision in mind. Salam meant to have students work in their own country, but come to ICTP and interact with academics across the world. This would give them the tools to return home and help advance science in their own countries. 

In Pakistan itself, Salam worked hard to advance scientific pursuit. Because he believed in service to his people and land, he returned home with the intention of improving scientific education and research there. A third of his Nobel Prize money went to education in Pakistan.1 He also served as science advisor to the Ministry of Science and Technology in Pakistan from 1960 to 1974. (He resigned due to his belief that atomic power should be used only for peaceful purposes.) Even when the Ahmadi sect was labeled as not Muslim, his loyalty and desire to improve the condition of his people was firm. In Salam’s own words, “I was born a Pakistani and I will die a Pakistani.”7

Though this is a brief overview, Abdus Salam’s life gives us a sad, yet rich and inspiring story of a talented scientist deeply rooted in a religious and cultural identity. It is a story that has been quickly and hauntingly lost in a short time, and his story is one  that I stumbled upon simply by chance. In 2020, we still have an unequal representation of non-western scientists in our history, and as unequal access to success in science persists, Abdus Salam’s story and vision is one that is important we do not lose. 

*loose traditional south asian pants

References:

  1. Abdus Salam – Banquet speech. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1979/salam/speech/.
  2. Lewis M. Abdus Salam – Biographical. Abdus Salam [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1979/salam/biographical/.
  3. Kamalakar A. Salam: The First ****** Nobel Laureate. 2018.
  4. Abdus Salam – Facts NobelPrize.org: Nobel Media AB 2020; Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1979/salam/facts/.
  5. Beall A. Abdus Salam: The Muslim Science Genius Forgotten By History2019. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20191014-abdus-salam-the-muslim-science-genius-forgotten-by-history.
  6. Britannica EoE. Parity. Particle Physics [Internet]. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/science/parity-particle-physics.
  7. Nadeem S. I was born a Pakistani and I’ll die a Pakistani: Abdus Salam1984 2017-06-07. Available from: http://herald.dawn.com/news/1153774.

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  From Juvenile Detention to Neuroscience

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending