Connect with us

Civic Science Times

The critical need for community based research in neuroscience and how UCLA and Charles R. Drew University are addressing it through their new Dana Center

Bernadette Weigman

Published

on

I am hearing about 3 helicopters hovering overhead right now.” Dr. Helena Hansen, co-PI of the UCLA and Charles R. Drew University (CDU) Dana Center for Neuroscience and Society said through the screen. We sat down to discuss the work being done at the Dana Center and, at the time, violence had sprouted on campus in response to pro-Palestinian protests. While helicopters were new to UCLA’s campus, they were very well known in neighborhoods just 20 miles away. Low flying helicopters are so pervasive in south central LA that it has become a real concern for residents of the area, including families.

The helicopter noise that Dr. Hansen was experiencing was incredibly topical as the pilot project that won UCLA/CDU the Dana Center grant was built around south LA resident’s concern over the helicopter noise in their neighborhood. Parents were worried about their children’s sleep health as these helicopters were often found flying late at night and early in the morning. Parents wanted to know its effects on the brain. “I’m getting the embodied experience of south LA residents right now,” Dr. Hansen noted.

Map of South Los Angeles. Google Maps, 2024. Retrieved July 11, 2024 from https://maps.app.goo.gl/hiF8vU7t8dFB8A8p9

Earlier this year, UCLA and CDU launched their Dana Center for Neuroscience and Society funded by the Dana Foundation (read more about the Dana Foundations funding efforts here). The center is co-led by Dr. Helena HansenDr. Gina Poe, and Dr. Ashley Feinsinger of UCLA, and Dr. Denese Shervington and Dr. Amy Woods of CDU. Charles R. Drew University is a medical school recognized as an HBGI (historically black graduate institution) and a member of the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities. CDU was founded in 1966 in the wake of the Watts Uprising and in direct response to the health needs of south LA members who were overlooked in healthcare.

Ultimately, the research and clinical work done at CDU is centered in the community of south LA. CDU’s commitment to community-centered research and medicine allowed for a beautiful partnership between them and UCLA. The UCLA/CDU center’s mission is to create a space for the residents of south LA, including community leaders, families, young people, and elders, to engage in neuroscience research. It will focus on community-based research, which impressed the Dana Foundation when they were reviewing the pilot project. To learn more about the center, I was privileged to speak with Dr. Hansen, Dr. Shervington, and Dr. Feinsinger.

During our conversation, Dr. Shervington emphasized the bi-directional nature of the research being done at the center. UCLA and CDU faculty and staff are actively working with the community to develop research questions, test hypotheses, and disseminate results together. Dr Feinsinger notes that the center is resisting “extractive models of engagement” and “top-down” research practices in which researchers come into communities, identify a problem, and solve it themselves. The center is relatively novel in that it is actively engaging with the community, not only by empowering them to ask the research questions, but by actually inviting them into the labs to do hands-on research.

In addition, faculty and staff from UCLA and CDU are going into south LA communities to learn from community members and understand their lived experiences. During my conversations, Dr. Hansen, Dr. Shervington, and Dr. Feinsinger all emphasized the immense expertise and knowledge south LA community leaders and members have surrounding not only the needs but the successes of their community. Meaning: south LA members know what they need and are capable of finding solutions. They have expertise that researchers can and should learn from. However, that doesn’t mean they are not without questions. Questions that the UCLA/CDU Dana Center want to help address through neuroscience research.

How does this work practically, though? The research done at the UCLA-CDU center for neuroscience and society is rooted in human-centered design. Human-centered design is an approach, often used in the business and technology sector, that focuses on the needs of the consumer. It involves clarifying and empathizing with the consumer needs and concerns, creating a solution, developing a prototype to beta-test, and, finally, implementing the solution. With a few tweaks, human-centered design is an excellent methodology to pursue community-based research, but is often left unused in academic research. Dr. Shervington explained to me how they engaged in human-centered design with south LA members.

Explore Next:  NextGen Voices on Global collaboration

The UCLA/CDU center started by hosting a think-tank in which they brought south LA community members together and asked them what their concerns or questions were and how they think neuroscience can address them. One of the issues that kept coming up was the issue of helicopter noise at night. As previously mentioned, low-flying helicopters are incredibly pervasive in south LA, flying late at night and early in the morning. Families and young people had become very concerned. Did the constant droning from the helicopters affect the brains of south LA children? Was it affecting residents’ sleep, and if so, how did that impact brain functioning?

True to their word, faculty and staff at the center took these concerns seriously and worked with community members to create research questions and hypotheses. Hypotheses that UCLA and CDU faculty and staff together with south LA residents were able to test using varying methods including in-field recording of helicopter noise and fruit fly breeding under similar noise conditions. Sure enough, true to south LA residents’ suspicions, preliminary results proved the helicopter noise did have an impact on the brains of their models. The Dana Center at UCLA/CDU is actively expanding on this research.

The work, however, did not stop there. Knowing what they know now, south LA residents and UCLA/CDU staff, including Dr. Nick Shapiro, who is working with the UCLA/CDU center, is bringing their results to LA City Hall where decisions on buying more helicopters for the Sheriff’s office are currently being made. During our conversation, Dr. Hansen emphasized this crucial piece: the Dana Center at UCLA/CDU does not want research to stop at the results. Its mission is to perform actionable research to not only help answer south LA resident’s questions about the brain and environment, but also engage in science-informed policy and advocacy, Dr. Hansen explained.

Ultimately, the Dana Center at UCLA/CDU is embarking on a critical mission of performing community-based neuroscience research. Dr. Ashley Feinsinger emphasized the “moral imperative” of such research. “Basic neuroscience, questions about the brain… sits in a very special place where science can really benefit people,” she states. However, if the brain research being done is not actually addressing the concerns or questions of society, including local communities, it calls into question the ethical implications of such research. As mentioned in our previous article, the Dana Foundation’s goal is to make the biggest impact in society, specifically, neuroscience and society.

The foundation clearly saw the great potential of the UCLA/CDU center to really benefit people and society by awarding it the Dana Center grant. The Dana Center at UCLA/CDU is breaking the mold of traditional academic research by performing bi-directional, human-centered research that is completely community-based. While their pilot project is very exciting and impressive, they are not stopping there. Dr. Hansen and Dr. Shervington shared some of their potential future research projects including examining what the community is doing to promote their own health, like creating community gardens, understanding the role of music and the arts in south LA and its effects on the brain, the effects of education inequality, and much more.

We will continue to follow the Dana Center at UCLA/CDU to see what they and the South LA community do next.

SEARCH <FUNDING> OR <NEUROSCIENCE> ON THE TERMINAL TO FIND MORE RELATED STORIES

Civic Science Times

Opinion: A missed opportunity for science communication at the 2024 Olympics?

Ariana DeCastro

Published

on

The Summer 2024 Olympics in Paris captivated the world as it was the first one that welcomed large crowds after the delayed 2020 Tokyo games. The Olympics generated double the traffic to media outlets compared to the 2020 games and incorporated AI and technology to support their athletes. However, despite these improvements there was a missed opportunity to include scientists and science communicators in their broadcasting efforts to enhance engagement with the public audience.

The Paris 2024 games were also unique in that they were the first that AI and big data were incorporated by the International Olympics Committee (IOC) as a part of the Olympic AI agenda. This is a part of the Olympic AI agenda launched in April 2024 that has five focus areas — supporting athletes, ensuring equal access to AI benefits, optimizing games operations, growing engagement with people, and increasing management efficiency for the IOC.

“AI can help to identify athletes and talent in every corner of the world. AI can provide more athletes with access to personalised training methods, superior sports equipment and more individualised programmes to stay fit and healthy. Beyond sporting performance, AI can revolutionise judging and refereeing, thereby strengthening fairness in sport. AI can improve safeguarding in sport. AI will make organising sporting events extremely efficient, transform sports broadcasting and make the spectator experience much more individualised and immersive.” — Thomas Bach, IOC President at an interactive event launching the AI Agenda

Science communication has increased in popularity particularly on TikTok. Since 2021, 15 million STEM related videos have been published globally and 33% of the US community is engaging with similar content on their dedicated feed. With the integration of AI and new technology into major sporting events there should be people who understand the science behind it and can share that with the decision makers and the public.

Incorporating science communicators and scientists could have enhanced viewing experiences for audiences. Science communicators could provide data driven analyses of the Olympic sporting events to increase civic science engagement but also trustworthiness of the broadcast.

Explore Next:  Questions about ensuring quality assurance for your participatory science project? US government websites can help

For example, Simone Biles, a popular athlete and captain of the US women’s gymnastics team, has had the physics of her routines analyzed on platforms such as NPR. Having a similar analysis incorporated into the main broadcast of the women’s gymnastics team could have increased the impact and significance of the historic nature of her skillset.

@wired Today, Simone Biles is leading #TeamUSA into the Women's Artistic Team All-Around #Gymnastics finals in hopes of clinching a gold medal. But as the #GOAT of gymnastics, it's worth taking a closer look at the incredible #physics of Simone Biles' Yurchenko Double Pike, dubbed the 'Biles II' which she'll be showcasing today. @rhettallain0, associate professor of physics at Southeastern Louisiana University breaks it down. #yurchenkodoublepike #bilesII #simonebiles #parisolympics #olympics ♬ original sound – WIRED.COM

“Science and technology are — they’re a big part of our sport. All the athletes are wearing, you know, some type of a smart device on them. And sometimes it’s multiple devices that measure multiple different things. I would say the most basic is just a smartwatch or a computer that they put on their bikes. Those things then upload into software that we have online that analyzes everything.” — Ryan Bolton, Triathlon Coach in an interview with Scientific American.

Science and technology are nothing new to the Olympic athletes and their coaches. In fact, it seems that athletes and coaches rely on having their own personal data to improve their performance. Seeing as this is already incorporated into the Olympic games, this presents an opportunity to provide paid positions for scientists, science communicators, and practitioners to participate in sharing this knowledge with the public.

How can scientists, science communicators, and other practitioners have a greater role in mainstream media? Audiences are clearly seeing and engaging with STEM related content on social media. What are sources of funding that can be explored to provide these opportunities? What data and research is necessary to show the significance of having science communication be a part of major sporting events?

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending