Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Science Without Disciplinary Borders: How my Interests in the Humanities Have Strengthened my Psychological Science

CSM Lab

Published

on

by Tiffany N. Brannon | Assistant Professor | Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles –

[dropcap]A[/dropcap]s children, my sister, Taquesha and I had a love for the humanities and science that extended beyond the boundaries of our school classrooms or even homework assignments. For fun and amusement, we would spend hours conducting science experiments that were described in a set of children’s encyclopedias that my mom had brought as a gift for us. We would similarly pass time reading and writing poems and short stories.

And, although no one in our family had earned a college-degree, we loved being young writers and scientists…it was our play and passion. In middle school, my sister and I both enrolled in a humanities focused magnet program and continued to excel as writers. Yet, our love for science never lagged behind our commitment to writing. In fact, despite accomplishing several firsts in my family including earning a doctorate from Stanford University and many other prestigious accolades my mother’s sharpest memory of me and awards involves a middle school ‘science’ award. Even now, she nostalgically reflects with me about how important it was to my ‘middle school’ self to win that ‘science’ award. And, every time she shares that memory I can only express a knowing and affirmative laugh; yes, even as a student in a humanities program I loved science and I cared deeply about excelling in both the humanities and science.

Throughout childhood play and even middle school years, the academic and disciplinary boundaries between the humanities and science seemed non-existent and invisible. Yet, in high school and college the boundaries became apparent and visible. Commensurate with my love for science, I decided early on that I wanted to major in psychology and to conduct experimental research. And, early on in college, as a first-year and sophomore student, I loved my psychology courses and I became involved in a clinical research lab as a research assistant at Florida International University (FIU). I was also a part of FIU’s Honors College and I deeply loved the interdisciplinary and strongly humanities-influenced curriculum. More specifically, as a student in the Honors College I passionately pursued interests related to dual-identity among African-Americans and how historical and contemporary experiences of prejudice and discrimination have forged a sense of self as an American and a sense of self as an African-American or what W.E.B. DuBois famously termed double consciousness. Thus, being a psychology major who was also in the Honors College allowed me to again follow my love for both science and humanities. Yet, I did not view my interests as related or intertwined; they seemed very much separate to me.

That summer, my undergraduate self who happened upon this insight, through a literature review and stellar guidance from research mentors, fell completely in love with cultural psychology and became committed to merging my interests in the humanities and science to strengthen and broaden the questions that myself as a psychological scientist could ask and dedicate a career to answering.

But thankfully, the separateness that seemed to mark my psychology and humanities interests was challenged when I participated in a Leadership Alliance research program at Stanford University in the summer following my sophomore year. By this time, my love for psychology still flamed bright yet I had decided that I was no longer personally interested in clinical psychology. At this point in my undergraduate career I was open to and very much intrigued by social psychology. During that summer research program, I was a research assistant in Hazel Rose Markus’ lab and I worked closely with her then graduate student MarYam Hamedani (who is now a Senior Research Scientist at Stanford University). As a research assistant, I helped with a literature review on interdependence or a sense of self, motivation and behavior that fundamentally involves awareness of and inclusion of others among American populations (e.g., European-Americans).

Tiffany N. Brannon

Helping with this literature review and engaging in dialogues with MarYam and other research assistants strengthened my knowledge of cultural psychology, and, in so doing, it challenged the boundaries that I had perceived between my interests in psychology and my interests related to dual-identity among African-Americans – which until then – was mostly informed by strongly humanities-themed courses and readings.  That is, working on that literature review provided an introduction to cultural psychology as a research area that, while focused on the individual and outcomes tied to the individual (e.g., affect, cognition, behavior, motivation), did not separate the individual or individual-level outcomes from macro and societal-level influences such as history, social institutions and everyday practices. From this perspective, one that views the individual and more macro-level influences as interconnected or as my doctoral advisor, Hazel Rose Markus would say mutually constituted insights gained from the humanities which often connects to and critiques history, social institutions and lived experiences can enrich theorizing within psychology. That summer, my undergraduate self who happened upon this insight, through a literature review and stellar guidance from research mentors, fell completely in love with cultural psychology and became committed to merging my interests in the humanities and science to strengthen and broaden the questions that myself as a psychological scientist could ask and dedicate a career to answering.

Explore Next:  Finding a Direction in Science

Today, I am an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles. My research lab studies socio-cultural identities among historically negatively stereotyped groups (e.g., African-Americans, Latino/a-Americans) and the conditions that allow these identities to be associated with risk and resilience. My lab seeks to understand and advocate for the role that institutions like colleges and universities can play in leveraging these socio-cultural identities to foster positive social, academic, health and even intergroup outcomes. In short, my lab studies diversity science, and with every research question, my lab seeks to address how we leverage our broadly defined diverse perspectives including the diversity of our interdisciplinary (both science and humanities) perspective.

Featured Image is by Ryan McGuire on Pixabay | CC0 Public Domain 

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  From Picking Grapes to Treating Cavities

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending