CivicSciTV - Questions of the Day
Sarah Dunifon’s dissertation surfaces the hidden layers of informal STEM education funding
Dr. Sarah Dunifon (Founder and Principal Evaluator of Improved Insights) an evaluation consulting firm specializing in STEM learning, discusses the research she conducted as part of her dissertation at the University of Pittsburgh looking at funding priorities and evaluation policies in informal STEM education to uncover trends and challenges in the field. She shares insights into how funders communicate their goals, noting that “funders are way more explicit about their funding priorities than they are about their evaluation policies,” which can leave nonprofits unsure about expectations.
Surprisingly, she found that “only two of 42 funders explicitly stated they would support evaluations financially,” despite evaluation being “how we show that we’re making progress towards our goals.” Dunifon also highlights the importance of transparency in evaluation practices, adding that tools like clear guidelines and monetary support signal that funders truly value this work.
Reflecting on terminology shifts, she points out that fewer funders use the term “pipeline” and now prefer “ecosystems” or “pathways” to describe STEM learning systems. She also emphasizes the need for funders to evaluate their policies critically, asking, “Are they transparent? Are they equitable? Does this fit within our values?”
Dunifon wraps up by discussing actionable insights for nonprofits, evaluators, and funders, and her vision for global research, stating, “An extension of this work that would be really interesting is looking globally at what funding networks exist elsewhere.”
Links
Chapters
0:00 CivicSciTV Intro
0:16 QOTD Intro
0:36 Previously on QOTD
1:27 Dunifon intro
2:45 Career Origins
4:43 What is ISE?
7:08 Funding Terminology
10:02 Study approach
12:26 Evaluation policies
16:08 Evaluation support
18:03 NSF AISL Model
19:52 Scholarship vs Practice
21:03 Actionable Insights
24:10 Future Directions
25:51 Current Applications
27:22 New Funders
28:21 U.S. Focus
Additional Reading:
Fanuel Muindi is a former neuroscientist turned civic science scholar-journalist and entrepreneur. He is a Professor of Practice in the College of Arts, Media, and Design at Northeastern University where he leads the Civic Science Media Lab. Dr. Muindi received his Bachelor’s degree in Biology and PhD in Organismal Biology from Morehouse College and Stanford University respectively. He completed his postdoctoral training at MIT.
Introduction to Science Policy nanolecture – Definitions, examples, and a thought excercise
Anthropomorphism and motivating participation in citizen science projects
On the speed of science and slowness of democracy. Navigating the various temporal realities.
The power of epistemic humility. Co-Founder of Eh!Woza in South Africa explains
At the 2024 American Geophysical Union annual conference, science journalists grapple with what’s next for science under the new administration
Visualizing the civic science domains Googled in 2024
Decoding Research!America’s Civic Engagement Microgrant program that funds student groups across the US
The power of epistemic humility. Co-Founder of Eh!Woza in South Africa explains
Introduction to Science Policy nanolecture – Definitions, examples, and a thought excercise
Anthropomorphism and motivating participation in citizen science projects
On the speed of science and slowness of democracy. Navigating the various temporal realities.
The power of epistemic humility. Co-Founder of Eh!Woza in South Africa explains
-
Civic Science Times3 weeks agoAt the 2024 American Geophysical Union annual conference, science journalists grapple with what’s next for science under the new administration
-
Civic Science Times1 month ago
In Manchester, New Hampshire, ‘Science on Tap’ is bringing science lovers and beer enthusiasts together
-
CivicSciTV Newsroom1 month ago
Founding CEO of Letters to a Prescientist on the impact of the Sandbox Fellowship
-
Civic Science Times4 weeks ago
Dr. Ashish Jha says ‘we have to remind people what the scientific process is and how it works with all of its flaws and self-correcting mechanisms.’
