Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

PhD or Family? Does it have to be one or the other?

Aditi Deshpande is a scientist at Allena Pharmaceuticals in Newton, MA. She is a biochemist and a chemical engineer by training. Dr. Deshpande is motivated to transform emerging science into products suitable for commercial development and also bring first-in class therapies into unmet disease areas.

CSM Lab

Published

on

Aditi Deshpande

[su_boxbox title=”About” box_color=”#262733″]Aditi Deshpande is a scientist at Allena Pharmaceuticals in Newton, MA. She is a biochemist and a chemical engineer by training. Dr. Deshpande is motivated to transform emerging science into products suitable for commercial development and also bring first-in class therapies into unmet disease areas.[/su_boxbox]

[dropcap]M[/dropcap]y grandfather inspired me into the world of science. He had a PhD in botany – the only one in the family โ€“ which he attained in the โ€˜40s in India. Looking back, I canโ€™t imagine what it must have been like to do a PhD back then. I remember his stories about how difficult it was to get a PhD. ย Surprisingly, I was not discouraged. In fact, I was inspired and I wanted get a PhD and carry forward his legacy. Thus, I left to pursue my dreams in the U.S. in 2003. I wanted to get the necessary educational training to enable me to make a difference in human lives. So, what happened? Here is my story.

I stumbled onto my first hurdle on my path while I was studying for my masterโ€™s in chemical engineering in the U.S. The issue was that my expectations of the program and my then advisor’s expectations of me did not match. I was made to feel that I was not good enough to be pursuing this path. My scientific interests were not taken into consideration when a project was assigned to me during my first year into the program.ย  It was not before it became evident to me that the environment was not right for me. I ultimately made the difficult decision to leave with a master’s degree and not pursue the PhD degree there. In retrospect, I actually thank those circumstances because I think they partly made me who I am today.

After leaving the program, I decided to pursue a job in industry. I started working for a pharmaceutical giant as an Associate Scientist. I got to learn many things during that period through the plethora of cross-discipline smart people I met and worked with every day. However, my dream to do a PhD still lingered in my mind. Though, as the years passed, I started feeling unsure whether I would be able to do it. Before I knew it, five years would pass by working at the same company and I was fairly close to turning 30 years old. My personal life didnโ€™t stop. I actually got married in that time frame. Both my personal and professional lives had changed quite a bit. But I kept asking myself whether the PhD would merely remain a dream in my life. Would I ever realize my love for research?

Things became quite challenging with the birth of my daughter 5 years into the program.

Some say that real dreams are those that don’t let you sleep. I think that was very true in my case. I wanted to go back to academia. My spouse encouraged me to take the plunge. However, so much time had passed that I had to retake the graduate record examination (GRE) and the test of English language proficiency (TOEFL) which are required to enroll in most US universities. I had taken those tests before coming to the U.S. but the scores had expired. I had to start all over again. After six months of tests and applications, I was elated when I got admitted to a PhD program in the Biochemistry & Biophysics!

Fast forward a year into my program, my son was born. The balance of being a first-time mom and a PhD student was very difficult to strike. I had finished most of the coursework and had started doing lab work. My research work was focused on development of techniques to biochemically characterize metal-dependent behavior of enzymes. I wanted to stay longer in the lab to get things moving like my fellow classmates but I could not. There was a little new born life waiting for me that I had to feed and look after. Things had drastically changed personally and I started to feel the real challenges of the road I had pursued. There were numerous times where I would get close to finishing experiments but would be forced to leave so that I could pick up my son from day care. I stopped socializing with fellow students and spent that time in the lab instead. I had to be 200% productive in the 5-6 hours I got in the lab each day. I also started working with and training undergraduate researchers who could help me manage the long hours. This opportunity also developed my mentoring skills which I published in the Working Life section of Science magazine in 2017.

Explore Next:  Debugging The Girl Code: My Journey in Computer Science and Confidence

As you probably know, the PhD process can be quite long. As such, it is very easy to lose focus on the big picture or your motivation at times. It happened to me on multiple occasions. The one I remember the most vividly took place in my third year at a time when my lab results were not promising at all and the equipment required for my work were not available at my university. I was almost ready to quit the project. I was in a position where I had to decide on how to move forward. It was clear to me that I had to make sure I stayed motivated and on track to finish my work no matter what. I ended up collaborating with a professor at Harvard University to gain access and training on the equipment required for my work.

Things became quite challenging with the birth of my daughter 5 years into the program. Managing the newborn, my toddler son and my work became very overwhelming. We decided to move closer to the university so that I could go to the lab whenever possible and work around my kidโ€™s schedule. Still in all of this chaos, there was something special that kept me going. I realized that my motivation to finish by PhD was stronger than before. My willingness to take on challenges was deeper than before.

I finally defended my PhD in 2016. My husband sat in a corner seat as I addressed a room full of scientists. It was an emotional moment for both of us. I flashed all the way back and I wondered how my grandfather would have felt if he was still around. My inspiration was in my family and my motivation all the years was also my family. It was my kids who helped me stay motivated. It was my spouse’s support that prevented me from quitting or getting derailed. I knew I had commitments to my family and I could only get to those if I kept going no matter what. In retrospect, I wonder how I would have done this without them.

I urge anyone in a similar phase of life wanting to pursue this road to go ahead and pursue your dreams. Your family will not be a hindrance but they will actually be the ones who will see you through. I am thankful things worked out for me. I now have my PhD and work as a scientist in early stage research programs at Allena Pharmaceuticals.

Cover Image byย Theodor Moise from Pixabay |ย CC0 Creative Commons

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  How Science Hobbies Shaped My Life

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending