Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

My Journey with Science

CSM Lab

Published

on

Anonymous

I have been interested in science from a young age when I liked to build intricate contraptions that I called “inventions”. These gadgets made from rubber bands and other household items helped me explore how moving parts worked and the basics of physical science. I remember when I discovered that I could reflect the images from my NES Duck Hunt game across mirrors in my basement and still hit the target. I would set up several mirrors in series reflecting the game on the television to test the limits of light reflection across extended distances. And when I got older, my parents bought science kits and taught me concepts such as electromagnetism by winding a copper wire around a nail, connected to a power source. I became fascinated with the hidden secrets behind everyday products and machines that we surround ourselves with.

By the time I reached college, I knew that I wanted to use my talent for discovery and design to help people. So I began studying for a career in biomedical engineering. I figured this track would allow me to figure out new ways to advance the medical field by designing and building cutting edge products and technologies. I really enjoyed the exhausting two-semester senior design projects that we developed in our biomedical engineering department. It was exciting to see a project go from idea to product. The concept of taking the initial concept to design development and finally building the contraptions we envisioned was amazing. For example, our team built a remotely operated monitor-lift created for a biomedical laboratory that used eye-tracking algorithms to assess diseases, as well as a custom-designed device to assist a patient with limited dexterity in opening oil-paints that the patient used in his career as an artist. It was highly rewarding to see our products in use to solve the specific problem they were designed for. My interest in these courses encouraged me to stay on for a master’s degree in biomedical engineering where I was able to learn even more about biomedical design and discovery.


By the time I reached college, I knew that I wanted to use my talent for discovery and design to help people.


One challenge I have had in my scientific tract is being interested in too many things at once and not focusing on a specific career goal. I think that the biomedical engineering track can sometimes add to this problem since you learn a little bit about almost everything but don’t focus in depth on one scientific niche as you would in another form of engineering or science. This is okay for many students who knew exactly what they wanted to do after they graduated. But for me, I just figured I would explore all of my options in the scientific realm when the time came for applying for jobs. This was probably the biggest mistake I made and my warning to biomedical engineering students: make sure you have an internship during college that will likely place you into your first engineering position. If you graduate and hope to find a position at a company, you might be presented with an interesting catch-22. When you search for an entry level position, the majority of postings require several years of experience. So, the best way to make sure to get your foot in the door is to have an internship during your junior/senior college years that can have the opportunity of becoming your first post-graduation job. My college internship was in an academic lab, which is not as useful if you’re trying to get a position at a biomedical corporation.

Explore Next:  Growing up in Science: Jane Willenbring

Since college, I have worked as a research scientist in academia. It has been very rewarding. I have had the opportunity to work with cutting edge technologies at Harvard, MIT and the University of Minnesota in electron microscopy, optogenetics, and non-invasive neuro-modulation. I have learned that academia fits my creative personality quite well; if you have an idea you can go ahead and do it that same day and discover what happens. In industry, you rarely get to see a project go from design to product, and you will most likely only have your hands in one small component of a project. In academia, you get to think up solutions to problems, build and test them, and see those ideas to fulfillment. In my experience, I’ve also learned that there is little place for a master’s degree in academia. If one plans to advance an ambitious research career at a university, it may be more useful to first attain a PhD. Luckily, our current project already has a significant collaboration with a local biomedical company. If the science continues to go well through this collaboration, there may be opportunities to join the biomedical company or even build our own start up. For now, I am happy dabbling in the latest biomedical technologies and will see if my career eventually bridges over to industry or stays within academia.


 

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  A Science Outreach Story

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending