Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Humans of HBI: Rockwell Anyoha

Rockwell Anyoha: “I just love animals. I grew up surrounded by nature and spent a lot of time interacting with both wild and domestic animals. We are always taught how “special” humans are, but in my childhood experiences of being bested in attempts to chase and capture also sorts of critters, I’d always felt that animals were just as impressive.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Rockwell Anyoha

[su_boxbox title=”About”]Rockwell Anyoha is a graduate student in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology at Harvard University and studies animal behavior in the labs of Professors Hopi Hoekstra and Bob Datta. Rockwell writes that “we sort of understand human behavior—when a human is angry or happy, what their gestures mean, and why they might do certain things. That’s not well understood in mice. And it’s also not understood how to understand it.” Follow him on Twitter. The story is co-published in collaboration with the Harvard Brain Science Initiative (HBI). Cover image by Celia Muto.[/su_boxbox]

Rockwell Anyoha – Portrait photo by Celia Muto.

What made you interested in animal behavior?
Honestly, I just love animals. I grew up surrounded by nature and spent a lot of time interacting with both wild and domestic animals. We are always taught how “special” humans are, but in my childhood experiences of being bested in attempts to chase and capture also sorts of critters, I’d always felt that animals were just as impressive. Educational shows such as The Crocodile Hunter were also inspirations for me. In that show, I was moved by Steve Irwin’s contagious excitement for animals and admired the respect he showed for them and their environments. I learned that animals were precious enough to warrant conservation, and interesting enough to warrant intellectual pursuit. Simply put, I’m convinced that animals are cool and do interesting stuff and learning about the things they do and how and why they do them can be both fun and fruitful. And finally, I find ethology particularly interesting because you have to think about the animal not only in the lab, but also in its natural context.

So how do you study animal behavior?
Through observation! I take 3D videos of mice and analyze their patterns of behavior. The framework, originally developed in the Datta lab, is called Motion Sequencing (MoSeq). To interpret the data, I use a two-pronged approach: evolutionary and developmental. The evolutionary approach is mostly what I do in the Hoekstra Lab. I observe different species of deer mice (Peromyscus) and look at similarities and differences in their behavior. I know how these mice are related and can precisely measure their behaviors. So I use this information to identify behaviors which may be evolutionarily meaningful. My lab mate, Nick Jourjine, refers to this system as our “model clade”.

The other approach is developmental, mostly what I do in the Datta Lab. I look at mice at different (behavioral) developmental stages and ask how patterns of behavior change over time.

What is one of the challenges in your work?
There are both technical and conceptual challenges related to measuring the behaviors of different species. On the technical side, different species have different shapes and sizes but need to be mapped onto the same space for quantitative comparison purposes. On the conceptual side, it’s not clear that behavior is objectively “map-able” across species with different morphology. Other challenges have to do with interpreting the differences in behaviors across species or even between experimental groups in the same species. It’s difficult to have an expectation of how different behaviors should be.

You mentioned liking to mentor younger students interested in research. What about your mentors? Have you had any great mentors on your way to graduate school?
Oh my God. So many great mentors. Unbelievable. I feel like every mentor I’ve had has been amazing. I feel very lucky.

Explore Next:  Searching for answers as a Space Physicist

What makes someone an amazing mentor?
If I had to choose one quality it would be patience, but there are many things such as imparting wisdom, showing excitement, challenging me, etc.! I can share a couple of anecdotes.

I had a graduate student mentor in my previous lab, Charlie Fulco. One time we were running a CRISPR screen that he had designed. It was his big project. He ran one iteration and wanted to repeat it to make it cleaner. So I was running the repeat— it’s expensive, a lot of steps —and I dropped a big cell culture flask, which held in it the entire screen. It just fell all over the floor, and I was terrified. I was like “Oh my God, I can’t believe I did this.”

The first thing Charles said – and this is his baby, remember – the first thing to come out of his mouth was a calm “Okay, how did this happen?” I told him how I grabbed the flask from the incubator and the top was a bit loose—and he right away explained how to tighten the cap better next time. Basically, the thing I learned Charlie was his attitude. That things sometimes fail and that’s expected… the most productive thing to do is turn it into a learning experience. Be positive. He really practiced and preached that.

My other graduate student mentor, Jesse Engreitz, taught me how to design experiments so that I could learn something each time—even when the experiment itself fails, or you get a negative result. He taught me that you can be a very, very critical scientist without ever being mean – having an “us against the problem” philosophy.

What is your ultimate career goal?
I want to be a research professor. I love research and want to keep doing it. I want to be able to ask and answer questions however I want. I really enjoy the academic environment, however, I also appreciate the fact that this atmosphere can be achieved outside of academia.

I saw a big dog in your lab photo. Is that yours?
Yes, it’s my dog Mochi! She’s three years old, a very active, curious, and silly dog. I love teaching her tricks. Everyone should follow her on Instagram (@queen_mochiii).

Did you have pets growing up?
Yes, I had a bunch. I had fish, a border collie named Buddy and a rat named Jive. I built a maze for Jive. I also briefly had parakeets. I have pet fish right now as well. I definitely watch their behavior and do experiments on them.

What do you do for fun outside the lab?
I play a lot of sports. I really love soccer. I also do a lot of hiking. And I like beaches – playing soccer on the beach, hiking to a beach, going in the water, or getting to an island where I can hike. The last hike I went on was Mount Osceola in the White Mountains. 

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  I always thought I wanted to be a scientist

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending