Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Humans of HBI: Caroline Palavicino-Maggio

Caroline Palavicino-Maggio: “During my childhood, I watched violent crimes transform my neighborhood. Now as a postdoc, I aim to understand the origin of aggressive behavior that underpins violent crimes. Though my work is rooted in neurobiology, I hope it will eventually metamorphose to have direct implications in understanding how our brains work when exhibiting aggression.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Caroline Palavicino-Maggio

[su_boxbox title=”About”]Dr. Palavicino-Maggio is a neuroscientist in the lab of Ed Kravitz in the Department of Neurobiology at Harvard Medical School. She studies how the brain regulates aggressive behavior. In her current project, she is identifying and characterizing the brain cells that activate female aggression. She uses the fruit fly model system because it allows one to control the activity of specific brain cells, and the genes those brain cells expressโ€”and then to infer whether or not that brain cell, region, or gene is involved in aggression. The story is co-published in collaboration with theย Harvard Brain Science Initiative (HBI).ย Cover image by Celia Muto.[/su_boxbox]

Caroline Palavicino-Maggio – Photo by by Celia Muto

What career did you aspire to as a child and why?
I was born in Harlem on 139st street and grew up in Washington Heights on 187th street. Later in my life, we moved across the George Washington Bridge to a small factory town called Edgewater. My mom sold home and food items on the streets to make ends meet. My dad worked for the New York City Housing Authority Projects for 35 years as an elevator mechanic.ย We were four siblings: my brother Jose, sister Angie, me, and my little sister Jackie. When I was 13 years old, I experienced a life altering event when my sister Angie ended her own life. As with anyone in this situation, I struggled to come to terms not just with the loss of my sister, who was also my idol, my best friend, my everything, but the implications of the way Angie had died. Knowing her so well, I couldnโ€™t understand what caused her suicide. Was it something in her relationships with others, including me? Survivors of suicide are often plagued with feelings of guilt and confusion, and I wanted to find an explanation for this seemingly inexplicable event in my life. Ultimately, I focused my scientific interest on questions of the interactions between brain functioning and neurochemistry in the context of behavior.

What is the hardest part about the work you do?
There are not enough tenure track positions available in neuroscience. There are also not many Latinas such as myself in academia. I know this will be a huge hurdle to overcome. No matter how great this challenge will be, I can never give up trying to make a space for diverse voices to be heard in neuroscience.

Who or what most inspires you and why?
During my childhood, I watched violent crimes transform my neighborhood. Now as a postdoc, I aim to understand the origin of aggressive behavior that underpins violent crimes. Though my work is rooted in neurobiology, I hope it will eventually metamorphose to have direct implications in understanding how our brains work when exhibiting aggression. I hope my work can eventually lead to contributions in criminal psychology, law, and society at large.

Which teacher made the biggest impact on your life?
As a student in New Yorkโ€™s Public School System, I was always intrigued by science, but never received any formal mentorship or encouragement to pursue a career in science. As a high school student, attending college seemed far out of reach, let alone embarking upon the daunting path of doctoral training. Because I never had formal mentorship as a high school student or undergraduate, the path to PhD was particularly difficult. Long after I graduated college, I saved up enough money to fly to San Diego to attend a meeting for the Society for Neuroscience. On the plane ride there, I sat completely by chance next to Dr. Nick Ingolglia, the Associate Dean of New Jersey Medical School at Rutgers University. He believed in me, mentored me, and encourage me to apply to graduate school. Although Dr. Ingolglia retired while I was in graduate school, I was very fortunate to also have the support and mentorship of my chair and Associate Dean, Dr. Andrew Thomas, who supported my independence and vision in my thesis work. Drs. Ingoglia and Thomas have had a tremendously formative impact on my life, and I now feel that it is my duty to inspire others in the same manner. Thus, the mentorship of young underrepresented students will always remain a key focus of my career as an academic scientist.

Explore Next:  The Day I Met Her

What is the trait you admire most in others?
Tenacity! No matter what happens you can never give up. As Dr. Martin Luther King once said, โ€œIf you canโ€™t fly then run, if you canโ€™t run then walk, if you canโ€™t walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.โ€

What are some of your interests outside the lab or office?
I currently serve on a few committees at Harvard Medical School, including the Diversity Pipeline of Community Engagement Committee from the Diversity Task Force, and the Equity and Social Justice Committee, both led by Dean Joan Reede. I am also involved with many outreach programs.ย My most recent project has been with theย Journal of Emerging Investigators (JEI), a free, open-access journal committed to helping middle and high school students learn the scientific method and communication.ย Through JEI, these students are able to publish their research (usually science fair or school projects). We send the studentsโ€™ reports to peer reviewers (postdocs and graduate students), who submit feedback about their experiments, writing, and figures. Reading articles submitted by their peers, students are empowered to perform independent research projects themselves.ย Although we receive submissions from around the world, my role as an outreach director has been specifically to recruit publications from Central America, South America and Africa. Currently, I am working on building collaborations with schools in Puerto Rico, Ethiopia and Kenya. We are alsoย launching aย pilot program this fall at HMS to open opportunities for underrepresented communities by encouraging publications in science by minorities.

What do you feel most passionately about?
I know first-hand how difficult it is to be a first-generation Latina in this field, and I feel deeply passionate about social justice in science. I am deeply committed to the diversification of science and to the betterment of underrepresented communities.

Family photos provided by Caroline Palavicino-Maggio.

What are your hopes for the future?
Social gatherings are everywhere in science! It is hard to think about what it takes to become a successful scientist other than doing brilliant science. But a strong network of scientist friends is essential for a successful career in academia. Collaborations, peer-reviews and feedback on grants, publications, recommendations, etc. often help one to navigate academia and end up on a successful track. More often than not, minority scientists have a hard time breaking into this social circle. And if we do break in, we may struggle with not losing our identity โ€” trying to mold into the masses rather than speaking about our struggles. This is why many of us do not stay in academia. Science is already difficult as it is, let alone doing it by yourself. It is my belief that a strong social network is an essential part of growth and development in academia. I hope that it will become easier for people of color to break into these networks, with others willing to meet them halfway.

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Everything Starts with a Dream

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending