Connect with us

Civic Science Times

From Labs to Lights, Camera, Action: What is the Role of Science Consultants in TV and Film?

Ariana DeCastro

Published

on

Science advisors have had a major impact on pop culture through motion pictures and TV shows — such as Twisters, Big Bang Theory, Oppenheimer, and almost every Marvel movie made. Science advisors, sometimes known as science consultants, “assists the entertainment industry in harnessing science as a creative means” according to the National Academy of Sciences Science & Entertainment Exchange.

The Exchange connects industry professionals in film and tv with scientists and engineers to consult on the science involved in their projects. Consultants work independently or through organizations such as the Exchange or even University of Southern California.

“Our mission is effectively to inspire more and better science in feature films, TV shows and video games,” says Rick Loverd, the program director of the Science & Entertainment Exchange Program, in an interview with to Inverse.com

However, consultants don’t necessarily fact check scientific aspects in a movie. They provide guidance to make sure that the science in the story is somewhat realistic. Advisors can even provide context on how explaining a specific context should feel or on what their experience as physicist, scientists, etc is like in real life.

Oppenheimer, for example, was a movie that had a cultural impact in Summer 2023 by earning $960 million at the box office and won Best Picture at the Oscars earlier this year. Christopher Nolan, Director of Oppenheimer, worked with scientific advisors for feedback on both the physics of the project and to understand more about J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life. David Saltzberg, a physicist at University of California Los Angeles and regular consultant on the Big Bang Theory, helped out with production scenes and with the prop manager on what was presented on chalkboards and papers between characters. Saltzberg explained the physics of dialogue lines to ensure they could understand the emotion that should be presented with it as well.

The cast of Oppenheimer accept the Best Picture award on March 10. Photographer: Kevin Winter/Getty Images Source: Bloomberg

“We often complain there’s no content in popular culture. For me, the biggest surprise was that this difficult movie about a difficult topic and a difficult man, shot in a difficult way, became a hit around the world. I feel that’s very encouraging. The hidden life of physicists has become a part of popular culture, and rightly so.” — Robbert Dijkgraaf, Theoretical Physicist, Dutch Minister for Education, Scientific Consultant on Oppenheimer, says in an interview with Nature.

There is no one size fits all job description for what a science consultant can do or how they can get involved in the field. Some may see this as an opportunity to leave the lab environment but mostly it seems that this role is seen as a side job to communicate scientific knowledge to the public and portray scientists as real people and role models. While they do get paid and credited for their work on a film or show, consulting for these projects seems like a way to have fun for scientists.

Explore Next:  Transforming Math for All: The Seattle Universal Math Museum leaders Tracy Drinkwater & Jenny Quinn share their goals and updates
Projects on the National Academy of Sciences’ Science & Entertainment Exchange website.

James Kakalios, science advisor on the Amazing Spider-Man, for example created a course called “Everything I Needed to Know About Physics I Learned From Reading Comic Books”. He used examples from Spider-Man comics to explain scientific concepts, such as van der Waals forces. When the film was released he turned his course into a book and was invited back to consult for other Spider-Man movies.

Science plays a major role in entertainment. According to the Pew Research Center, 81% of Americans watch science-related programs including criminal investigations, hospital and medical settings, and science fiction. Science consultants and advisors can have an important impact on how the public interacts with, comprehends, and reacts to science. For example, science advisor Donna Nelson consulted on Breaking Bad along with the US Drug Enforcement Agency to ensure that the show did not glorify misuse and include harmful aspects of the drug production process.

Despite the impact that consultants can have on popular media and entertainment they do not receive the press coverage aligned with the significance of their role. Additionally, it’s not really clear whether these advisors are paid their worth for their knowledge. Screen credit is inconsistent and science advisors do not get a mandatory listing while other behind the scenes consultants such as animal trainers get paid a high rate. Further, within a movie budget a science advisor’s fee falls into the category of “below the line” expenses for perks or services that are helpful but not necessary.

“Credit optional. Remuneration especially optional,” says Malcolm MacIver, bioengineer and consultant on Tron Legacy and Terminator: Genesis, in an interview with Nature. “I don’t think that [working without pay] will change until the appropriate institutions provide pressure”

Science consultants shape how science is viewed by the public. They ensure a realistic touch that viewers enjoy when it comes to science-related entertainment. Consultants also shape how scientists can be portrayed in movies and films as real people and role models for their viewers. Despite the influence that consultants have on entertainment there seems to be a lack in designated funding and accolades for those in this role. Unfortunately, this makes the consultant role accessible to people who can financially afford to do this as a side hustle compared to a full time job.

To be able to address the issues in the field there needs to be standardization in the industry in the form of data. There is currently no data on the breakdown of the industry — who are science consultants, do they work mostly full time or part time, and what is the pay based on experience. Having this knowledge will help present the issues to both the scientific and entertainment community so that solutions can be formed.

Civic Science Times

Opinion: A missed opportunity for science communication at the 2024 Olympics?

Ariana DeCastro

Published

on

The Summer 2024 Olympics in Paris captivated the world as it was the first one that welcomed large crowds after the delayed 2020 Tokyo games. The Olympics generated double the traffic to media outlets compared to the 2020 games and incorporated AI and technology to support their athletes. However, despite these improvements there was a missed opportunity to include scientists and science communicators in their broadcasting efforts to enhance engagement with the public audience.

The Paris 2024 games were also unique in that they were the first that AI and big data were incorporated by the International Olympics Committee (IOC) as a part of the Olympic AI agenda. This is a part of the Olympic AI agenda launched in April 2024 that has five focus areas — supporting athletes, ensuring equal access to AI benefits, optimizing games operations, growing engagement with people, and increasing management efficiency for the IOC.

“AI can help to identify athletes and talent in every corner of the world. AI can provide more athletes with access to personalised training methods, superior sports equipment and more individualised programmes to stay fit and healthy. Beyond sporting performance, AI can revolutionise judging and refereeing, thereby strengthening fairness in sport. AI can improve safeguarding in sport. AI will make organising sporting events extremely efficient, transform sports broadcasting and make the spectator experience much more individualised and immersive.” — Thomas Bach, IOC President at an interactive event launching the AI Agenda

Science communication has increased in popularity particularly on TikTok. Since 2021, 15 million STEM related videos have been published globally and 33% of the US community is engaging with similar content on their dedicated feed. With the integration of AI and new technology into major sporting events there should be people who understand the science behind it and can share that with the decision makers and the public.

Incorporating science communicators and scientists could have enhanced viewing experiences for audiences. Science communicators could provide data driven analyses of the Olympic sporting events to increase civic science engagement but also trustworthiness of the broadcast.

Explore Next:  Questions about ensuring quality assurance for your participatory science project? US government websites can help

For example, Simone Biles, a popular athlete and captain of the US women’s gymnastics team, has had the physics of her routines analyzed on platforms such as NPR. Having a similar analysis incorporated into the main broadcast of the women’s gymnastics team could have increased the impact and significance of the historic nature of her skillset.

@wired Today, Simone Biles is leading #TeamUSA into the Women's Artistic Team All-Around #Gymnastics finals in hopes of clinching a gold medal. But as the #GOAT of gymnastics, it's worth taking a closer look at the incredible #physics of Simone Biles' Yurchenko Double Pike, dubbed the 'Biles II' which she'll be showcasing today. @rhettallain0, associate professor of physics at Southeastern Louisiana University breaks it down. #yurchenkodoublepike #bilesII #simonebiles #parisolympics #olympics ♬ original sound – WIRED.COM

“Science and technology are — they’re a big part of our sport. All the athletes are wearing, you know, some type of a smart device on them. And sometimes it’s multiple devices that measure multiple different things. I would say the most basic is just a smartwatch or a computer that they put on their bikes. Those things then upload into software that we have online that analyzes everything.” — Ryan Bolton, Triathlon Coach in an interview with Scientific American.

Science and technology are nothing new to the Olympic athletes and their coaches. In fact, it seems that athletes and coaches rely on having their own personal data to improve their performance. Seeing as this is already incorporated into the Olympic games, this presents an opportunity to provide paid positions for scientists, science communicators, and practitioners to participate in sharing this knowledge with the public.

How can scientists, science communicators, and other practitioners have a greater role in mainstream media? Audiences are clearly seeing and engaging with STEM related content on social media. What are sources of funding that can be explored to provide these opportunities? What data and research is necessary to show the significance of having science communication be a part of major sporting events?

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending