Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Finding Myself Between Cacti in Mexico

“Being a research professor is not a 9-5 job. The work is never finished and there is always the next question. That is the fun of doing science.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Stefan de Folter

[su_boxbox title=”About”]Stefan is Dutch and did his scientific training in the Netherlands. He is now a Research Professor at UGA-LANGEBIO at the Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV-IPN) in Mexico. He works in the field of Plant Development and Functional Genomics. Furthermore, he is a member of the editorial board of several scientific journals, a Faculty Member of the F1000, and a member of the Mexican Academy of Sciences (AMC). He can be reached via LinkedIn and Twitter @defolter_lab.[/su_boxbox]

[su_boxnote note_color=”#d9d8d6″]

Story Key Points:

  • Use the opportunities that come on your path.
  • Treat people how you want to be treated.
  • Take the time to think about what you really want.[/su_boxnote]

[dropcap]E[/dropcap]very now and then, there are moments in life when you pause to think about all the good things that have happened. It is in those moments that one can become aware of how fast time flies. One moment you are a trainee worrying about the future, and with a blink of an eye, you are a faculty member with a great family and a backyard with cacti! I am thankful for the success I have enjoyed in my career thus far โ€“ having more than half a hundred of papers, and even a handshake with the president of Mexico for receiving a national research award given by the Mexican Academy of Sciences (AMC). Sometimes I am asked: what is the secret? The quick answer I could give without much thinking is that it is just work. However, is that all it takes?

Let me take you on my journey in science.

As a kid already interested in plants, I did my undergraduate studies in Plant Biotechnology at Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands where I finished in 1998. In the last year of my studies, I worked in a plant molecular biology lab at the Plant Research International Research Institute (nowadays part of Wageningen University & Research) in the Netherlands. I worked on analyzing Arabidopsis mutants, cloning and mapping a gene of interest โ€“ still without a genome sequence โ€“ making transgenic plants, doing some microscopy, and all the other things you could do to study a gene. After graduating, I was asked to stay a few months more. This happened a couple of extra times till I finally got my permanent contract.

Good or bad?

I am convinced it was good. However, my backpack that was ready to travel the world stayed in my closet. I started to work on the involvement of transcription factors in flower development. After several years watching PhD students pass through the lab, I too wanted to start my own PhD research in the hopes of working on a functional genomics project on all MADS-box transcription factors of Arabidopsis.

Stefan de Folter

At the end of 2005 – when my PhD dissertation was under review by the reading committee – I did a short academic stay at the national university (UNAM) in Mexico City. The opportunity gave me a chance to experience Mexico from the scientific side. Beforehand, I only knew the country from prior holiday travel because my wife is Mexican and is also a scientist. We had met years before at work in Wageningen transforming Arabidopsis plants. Coming back from my short academic stay in Mexico, I defended my PhD thesis in 2006. After a one year postdoc in the same lab in Wageningen, I was offered the opportunity to start my own lab in 2007 in Mexico at a new research institute called LANGEBIO. The institute was part of the national research center called CINVESTAV-IPN. Surprisingly, I was given this opportunity without me speaking any Spanish!

Being a research professor is not a 9-5 job. The work is never finished and there is always the next question. That is the fun of doing science.

Okay, it was me who liked the adventure, and of course, a Mexican spouse makes the difference. In fact, we started the lab together! She now runs her own lab. So, I was excited to finally get the chance to use that backpack stored in my closet and to learn Spanish! Many ask what Mexico is like. The simple answer is that Mexico is great! I make it a point to enjoy the good things and not focus on the bad things which you can find anywhere one lives. Yes, there are differences: culture, organizational structures, climate, food (really nice!)โ€ฆ Well, reagents have a tendency to arrive late, or sometimes not at all. You learn to plan and be creative, and sometimes you have to be a bit more patient. There are many talented students as well as leading research centers and universities. Though, I think that it would be good and important that more money be made available for science in Mexico.

Explore Next:  Finding a Direction in Science

Nowadays, I think the modern busy life style of many people does not permit much time to think deeply. Often, we do not take the time to think about what we really want and articulating important questions in our lives. For trainees in science, it is crucial to find good mentors who will help you think deeply about important biological questions whose answers will lead to the generation of new knowledge. Moreover, trainees need to also think deeply about how they want to use their science in ย starting a lab, a postdoc position, being a representative of a company, founding a company, teaching, or even becoming a politician? There are many possibilities that science offers. One is not better than the other. It is a personal decision. Personally, my idea was to stay at the bench; though, after a few years, I changed my opinion and started my PhD research with the work I was already doing. Finally, the daily job changed from the bench to the desk. Do I regret it? No, not a single day.

How do you choose a lab? How do you build a career in science? Choosing a lab is important from the beginning. It matters as early as during your undergraduate studies. This is especially important when the plan is to stay in academia. How many articles are published per year by the lab, what type of articles, in which scientific journals, lab composition (students vs. postdocs), lab atmosphere, lab reputation, professorโ€™s expectations, and so much more. There are a lot of things to take into account. On the other hand, when I started my undergraduate thesis work, I did not really know all this. I made my decision mostly based on that I liked the field of work and the place. Sometimes, this is enough. When I started the PhD in the same lab, I already knew the lab for several years, and I had no doubt that I was in the right place.

Being a research professor is not a 9-5 job. The work is never finished and there is always the next question. That is the fun of doing science. If you think that is not fun, reconsider whether this is the path for you. When starting a scientific career โ€“ particularly referring to graduate students โ€“ it is not the hours in the lab that make the difference. When possible, produce results for more than one article, even if your dream is to put all the results in one article for one of the big journals out there, because it would still only be one article. To be competitive, you need to have a good number of articles on your CV. That is the unfortunate reality of the scientific enterprise: publish or perish. Of course, it matters where your articles are published. ย As such, a balance in quantity and quality is useful. The magic number does not exist. But again, it is important to remember that science offers multiple avenues for you to find your own meaning and purpose. Academia is just one pathway.

What about collaborations? Collaborations can be very fruitful. Though, one has to very selective. Many times, the best collaborations are based on long friendships, trust, respect, and honesty. I have been lucky to have found great collaborators, with my wife being my favorite collaborator. Coming back, so what are some secrets for success in science? Preparation, persistence, support, some luck, taking advantage of opportunities, hard-work, finding good mentors…. and having fun along the way. As you advance in the career, remember to treat people like how you would like to be treated.

Cover Image by rawpixelย fromย Pixabayย 

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Masterโ€™s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled โ€œFrequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysโ€ which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals โ€ฆ then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  My experience as a Kurdish Undergraduate Scientist in Iraq

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experimentsโ€ฆ. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293โ€“4312.

โ€”

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending