Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Debugging The Girl Code: My Journey in Computer Science and Confidence

Anagha Krishnan: Days later, my mind was reeling. How could she say something like that? My mother, who couldn’t attend the conference with me, was very angry when she heard the story. “That’ is absolutely ridiculous,” she said, “You can do both. You can do whatever you want to do.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Anagha Krishnan

[su_boxbox title=”About” box_color=”#262733″]Anagha Krishnan is an undergraduate biomedical engineering and computer science student at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She is also the founder and executive director of TheGirlCodeProject, a mentorship program that leverages computer science to empower young women. You can reach her on LinkedIn or at her personal website, www.anaghak.com[/su_boxbox]

[su_boxnote note_color=”#d9d8d6″] Key Points

  • Underlying issues such as lack of confidence and self-efficacy prevent women from entering and continuing in STEM fields.
  • Computer science and other STEM fields can promote self-efficacy and resiliency in young women.
  • Believe in yourself and be proud of your accomplishments.[/su_boxnote]

[dropcap]S[/dropcap]o, as you can see, the Earth’s Field MRI, which is one-thousandth of the price of a conventional MRI, provides sufficient image quality for copper chloride imaging. Thus, even though it relies on the earth’s 0.5 Gauss magnetic field instead of an MRI’s 5,000 Gauss magnetic field, it can be a viable option for inexpensive disease detection in third-world countries. That concludes my presentation; does anyone have any questions?” 

Anagha Krishnan

I heaved a sigh of relief, letting my tense shoulders relax. I had just finished presenting my research at an academic conference. It had been the culmination of years of research in a biophysics lab at UT Dallas and UT Southwestern—countless hours of machining MRI parts, creating copper chloride samples, and analyzing MRI images. As I looked into the audience, I didn’t think I could feel prouder.

A woman raised her hand in the back. “Why are you here?”

In my naïveté, I couldn’t help thinking that it was such an easy question to answer. “Well, I’m here presenting my research.” Duh.

“No,” she replied. “My son is also presenting here. There don’t seem to be many girls here. Don’t you think your time would be better spent at dance classes? Or cheerleading?”

A lot of people turned around and glared at her, but I was too startled to say anything. I struggled to recollect my thoughts and just moved on to the next question.

Days later, my mind was reeling. How could she say something like that? My mother, who couldn’t attend the conference with me, was very angry when she heard the story. “That’ is absolutely ridiculous,” she said, “You can do both. You can do whatever you want to do.”

It was then that I realized the bubble I had been living in. I had been lucky enough to grow up surrounded by strong women in the sciences: my mother was a computer science consultant, my aunt was a science professor, and my eldest cousin worked at the NIH. In my mind, women were just as capable as men were.

As the bubbles popped, I began to see my life as a female engineer from a whole new perspective. I began noticing the little things that I had previously ignored. Like how it terrified me to raise my hand in class, but the boys in my class would blurt out completely incorrect answers all the time. Like how my male cousins were often unknowingly treated as intellectually superior to my female cousins, despite my female cousins holding better jobs. Reading the news only makes me feel worse. Hearing stories about gang rapes in India, child marriage in the Middle East, and body image issues in the Western world made me feel as if there was no hope.

I began to realize that even me, despite having a plethora of astounding female role models to look up to, faced barriers that held me back. I realized that I lacked confidence and self-efficacy; I was never sure of the decisions I was making, and I always felt that I would fail the first time I did anything. I struggled with self-doubt following even the smallest failures, and I often held myself to higher standards than I did the people around me.

I began to wonder how much of this was due to societal gender roles. Women, growing up, are taught to be docile and quiet. Society teaches young women that they must look and act perfect (think of such phrases as ‘Don’t spill anything on your dress” or “Your hair is such a mess.”), and this often leads to women becoming perfectionists in their professional careers and suffering from crippling self-doubt at their first failure. Additionally, society teaches young women to be agreeable; this makes it difficult for women to voice their opinions, especially when they are contrary.

I am no longer scared to voice my contrary opinions or make mistakes, and I will continue to be assertive and powerful until I get the things that I need to succeed.

When I took my first computer science class, I realized something. Compared to the biomedical lab that I worked in (where if you made a mistake, you had killed a rather expensive cell-line), mistakes in computer science were frequent and forgivable. If your code errored, the compiler (or the programmer) would find the error and debug their code. Errors were not only okay, but often helpful, as they pointed out larger errors in logic and helped diagnose problems the user might face. Computer science often fostered teamwork and assertiveness as well (many times, it was easy to show that you could solve the same problem in less lines of code).

Explore Next:  Humans of HBI: Rockwell Anyoha

I realized that the lack of women in technical fields in higher education was a symptom of a greater issue: the fact that we don’t teach girls to be confident and assertive the way we teach boys to. I began to wonder if we could use STEM to teach young women confidence and assertiveness—the building blocks of self-efficacy that studies have shown keep women in STEM.

To that end, I started an organization, TheGirlCodeProject, which aims to “debug the Girl Code” by leveraging computer science to teach young girls self-efficacy. The program targets middle-school girls (particularly from under-represented ethnic and economic groups) because middle school is the time when girls begin to doubt their capabilities compared to boys. In our program, the girls learn the basics of game design in GameMaker, spend a summer designing a game designed to promote less-accessible STEM fields (such as biomedical or aerospace engineering) to other girls, and demo their games for judges.

Through the program, the girls not only learn the basics of computer science, but they also develop resiliency, confidence, assertiveness, problem-solving, and team-building skills. We are funded by the Google igniteCS program, the National Center for Women and Information Technology, and Georgia Tech’s Create-X program, and in two years, we have mentored over fifty young women. More information about TheGirlCodeProject can be found at our website, www.thegirlcodeproject.com.

I truly feel that TheGirlCodeProject is helping young women develop the skills that will help them succeed not only in STEM, but in any field they choose to pursue (self-efficacy is a skill you need no matter what you choose to do). It has helped me develop my own confidence and resilience; I am no longer scared to voice my contrary opinions or make mistakes, and I will continue to be assertive and powerful until I get the things that I need to succeed.

Women, historically and in the present-day, face many setbacks, but I am confident that, with the support of each other, we won’t just break the glass ceiling, but we will demolish it.

Cover Image by RawPixel from Pixabay | CC0 Creative Commons

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Unexpected lessons from conducting research with older adults

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending