Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

But You Are A Girl!

Sophie Farr: “In a society where most famous celebrity women are known for makeup and fashion, most girls think they can’t get anywhere as a woman unless they want to do fashion or art. I want that to change.”

CSM Lab

Published

on

Sophie Farr

[su_boxbox title=”About”]Ms. Sophie Farr is a 12 year old student at an all girls school in the UK. She is best known through her Twitter account @ScienceSoph where she describes herself as “a science obsessed, militant feminist and outspoken 89-year-old trapped in a teenage girl’s body.” She tweets about what it’s like to be a young girl in the science community.  You can learn more from her website. [/su_boxbox]

[su_boxnote note_color=”#d9d8d6″]Story Key Points:

  1. Let’s create more women role models in science.
  2. Let’s not brainwash girls into thinking that science is hard and only for boys.
  3. Let daughters grow up in a world of possibilities and opportunities.[/su_boxnote]

Sophie Farr

[dropcap]I [/dropcap]am 12 years old and go to an all-girls school in the UK. One day I hope to be an engineer, chemist or doctor in a world where science isn’t stereotyped; in a world where science reflects the people we are from within and not obscured by society’s views from the outside. I want to represent a world of science that is open to everyone and doesn’t just have a “male” title. I want to be in a world where girls aren’t brainwashed into thinking that science is hard and there isn’t a point in them trying.

At an all-girls school, you get an insight into why science is a predominantly male field. Many of my class-mates arrived at the school having never done science before. But for some reason, they were already sure they couldn’t do it and wouldn’t want to either. I was very confused by this because all I was thinking is that science is awesome! I was lucky because I hadn’t been brought up hearing about how “physics is impossible” and “only boys do science subjects.” When you arrive at an all-girls school, one realizes that it isn’t because of boys; girls think they can’t do science. I think adults are partly to blame for this. Why?

In a society where most famous celebrity women are known for makeup and fashion, most girls think they can’t get anywhere as a woman unless they want to do fashion or art. I want that to change.

Well, many girls grow up with adults telling them “harmless” things like to “be more ladylike.” A girl is told to be ladylike if she does a messy science experiment or runs about exploring insects in the mud. Would a boy of the same age be told to act “more like a man”, or would he be patted on the back and told he was going to be an amazing astronaut or explorer? Adults blatantly convince girls that they are giving up their femininity due to their passion for science or tech. In a society where most famous celebrity women are known for makeup and fashion, most girls think they can’t get anywhere as a woman unless they want to do fashion or art. I want that to change.

Explore Next:  Moments: My Daughter’s Journey in Science as a Father

If we are going to change girl’s feelings about science subjects and careers in science, we need to start with the adults. Instead of squashing young girls’ dreams and making them feel constricted, we should nurture them and watch them flourish as they grow. Let daughters grow up in a world of possibilities connected with being a girl rather than it being a bad label or condition. Instead of saying “but you’re a girl, you can’t do science,” tell young girls, “you’re a girl, so rock science.”

What does acting like a girl mean anyway? I spend most of my time in jeans and jumpers researching science puns and experiments. At school, my favorite subject is chemistry but physics and mathematics are a close second. I love chemistry because it seems limitless and I find it really interesting to realize how much influence we can have on our world through science. I have another three years before I sit my GCSE exams; but I have already started doing some GCSE sheets in chemistry because I love it so much! My dream job would probably be either a research scientist or an anesthesiologist as both are such rewarding jobs. Research scientists are improving our lives and those of future generations, and they are making the major breakthroughs of our generation. Anesthesiologists are amazing as they serve the critical function of keeping patients stable during operations. Of course, chemistry is also at the core of what they do with the compounds they use to induce the state of anesthesia. So, I don’t think you could get a more important or rewarding job! At least, I think so! But of course, I equally love watching makeup videos and doing hair with my friends! I can passion for both.  Why not!

So, let us celebrate the potential of girls around the world. There is a lot of potential out there.

Cover Image by MorningbirdPhoto from Pixabay | CC0 Creative Commons

[su_boxbutton url=”https://storiesinscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Farr-Sophie_Stories-in-Science-DOI-.pdf” target=”blank” style=”flat” background=”#000000″ color=”#ffffff” size=”5″]Download the Story![/su_boxbutton]

Metrics

Sessions

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:sessions” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Total number of Sessions. A session is the period time a user is actively engaged with the page.

Visitors

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:visitors” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Users that have had at least one session within the selected date range. Includes both new and returning users.

Page views

[analytify-stats metrics=”ga:pageviews” analytics_for=”current” custom_page_id = “”permission_view=””]

Pageviews is the total number of time the article was viewed. Repeated views are counted.

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  The Journey Continues: Finding My Questions in Science

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending