Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

A non-linear path to the career I never knew I always wanted

CSM Lab

Published

on

By Valerie K. Haftel Ph.D | Associate Professor of Biology, Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA


[dropcap]I[/dropcap] was always fascinated by animals, and how they work in nature.  I had a fondness for playing in streams with friends, catching frogs, collecting buckets of fish and trying to train them, playing with all manner of pets, and wanting to explore how they all work throughout my education.  I was fascinated by physiology, even if I didn’t quite know what that meant.  At the same time, I always had a feeling that I was different from everyone else.  I was the youngest of three children of a Hispanic mom and Jewish dad living in a suburban, mostly white neighborhood. I had darker skin, dark curly hair, relatives that spoke a different language, relatives that practiced a different religion.  These things, along with being quite introverted set me apart.  No, this is not a story about a serial killer in the making.  It’s a story about what good role models can do for a shy child who loved biology.

As a kid, I loved to learn, and compete with classmates to see who could finish assignments better and faster.  I had a few really good teachers and role models in high school who inspired me to learn more, push harder and ask questions. They gave us things to do, brought in the newest information on science, and didn’t just expect us to memorize facts.  My teachers were kind and gifted women scientists who worked hard to set us up for success.  In fact, Doc Ellis (AP Biology teacher) working on her PhD while teaching and raising a family showed me that I could do all that and be an excellent, caring teacher and scientist.  I held her up as a source of inspiration, and still do!

Strangely enough, the idea of becoming a scientist like Doc Ellis wasn’t on my radar.  I wanted to be a “real” doctor!  Apart from my High School role models, I didn’t see a lot of women scientists who also loved mentoring and education.  I worked as a teaching assistant and tutor during undergrad, and continued as I acquired a MS in Physiology.  After examining what it was that I was doing with my time, I finally realized that it wasn’t through medicine that I wanted to help others, but through education.  In one of my graduate courses I learned about synaptic plasticity and was fascinated that a cellular change at a single synapse could be the answer to how to learn and remember!  I enrolled in a PhD program to figure out how people learn and to gain experience to inform my future in education.  Of course I found myself in a neurophysiology lab doing, you guessed it: spinal cord physiology (truly a good model of synaptic plasticity)!


The young, sharp minds in my lab and my courses teach me more every day about why it is so important to be here and contribute all the energy I can to ensure their success. Without these young men in our scientific work force, we would lose creative genius that would contribute to breakthroughs in science and technology in ways we may not be able to imagine right now. 

I enjoyed the research and loved physiology, but struggled with my next steps, not having many role models to ask about transitioning into a career in science mentoring and teaching during my PhD program.  Eventually, I had the difficult discussion about my future with my PI, and disclosed that a full time research-only career wasn’t for me.  I wanted to incorporate research, but was drawn to teaching and mentoring science students to guide them to the right path and experiences for them to achieve their goals.  In that difficult discussion, I planted a seed in his mind that enabled him to introduce me to a great opportunity that changed my life: the new NIH-funded FIRST Postdoctoral Fellowship program at Emory University.  It wasn’t only the curriculum of the program but the links to dedicated people and historic places that made a difference in my career.  The program focuses on training in innovative teaching techniques, while carrying out biomedical research, with an emphasis on working in Minority-serving institutions in Atlanta as role models of success in science/education.  Mentors and opportunities in teaching at Spelman College, one of the most prestigious Historically Black Colleges in the world, highlighted the need for mentors to do better by the African American community in encouraging young minds to thrive in science and technology.

Explore Next:  My Journey Coming Out of the Deep Dark Ditch of “publish or perish”

I felt I could contribute because in some ways I identified with feelings of being set apart as a child for my heritage, and I wanted to prevent others who may feel the same way from becoming discouraged. I wanted to merge my love of science and the support I had growing up with the desire to teach and mentor a group of students who don’t always have the support they need.  I was fortunate to obtain job at Spelman’s sister institution, the equally prestigious Morehouse College. I felt this was the best fit for me to continue my work in research, teaching, mentoring, and really caring for my students where I could make a difference.  This was also a time for me to become independent as a researcher.  For this, I drew inspiration from my research experience in neural regeneration and plasticity, and the prevalence of diabetes and its secondary complications in my family, the Hispanic, and African American communities.  These connections are essential to highlight, as the inspiration for my work comes from diverse sources, yet ties them together in fundamental ways.  We need to support the communities that are affected by these issues to supply the researchers and health care providers and educators surrounding these problems, and to come together to create the solutions.

The rewards of my career in science teaching and mentoring have been immeasurable.  Each one of my students who I mentor in my research lab has become part of my family.  The young, sharp minds in my lab and my courses teach me more every day about why it is so important to be here and contribute all the energy I can to ensure their success.  Without these young men in our scientific work force, we would lose creative genius that would contribute to breakthroughs in science and technology in ways we may not be able to imagine right now.  Those few who may fall through the cracks teach me that there is more work to be done and not enough resources to support them.  And so we work harder.

Photo by Wellcome Trust |No changes were made to the original image | Some rights reserved


 

 

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Tell the Negative Committee to Shut Up

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending