Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

The Day I Met Her

I carefully approached her with the intention to learn more. I took the first step to introduce myself with a “hi, my name is Ivan.” It didn’t quite work as she seemed hesitant to respond. Nevertheless, I had to strike a conversation and so I went on with…

CSM Lab

Published

on

– Yow Ying Ming Ivan – 

[dropcap]W[/dropcap]omen are commonly stereotyped to be more artistically inclined, coupled with limited talent for mathematics. No one explicitly mentioned to me about these discriminations, but such thoughts are subtly imbued in the Asian culture. When I was back in high school, subconscious mentions of ‘guys are better in engineering’ or ‘girls cannot do technical stuff’ hinted at how students, and even educators, condemned women into the connotation that science is not for women. Guilty as charged. I harbored those thoughts during my younger days. But all this changed the day I met her.

Yow Ying Ming Ivan

She was an inconspicuous figure in the Group Endeavors in Service Learning (GESL) orientation camp during the start of our postgraduate diploma in education program at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. The GESL camp aimed to inculcate servant leadership mentality in future teachers and we had to come up with a service learning initiative to reach out to the local community. I was one of the leaders of the group and my role was to gel the group mates together and to take care of their wellbeing. No one knew – even the other leader of the GESL group – anything about her.

I was fascinated by both her personality and her passion for physics. 

I carefully approached her with the intention to learn more. I took the first step to introduce myself with a “hi, my name is Ivan and I am one of your GESL leaders. I would like to know more about each of our team members and I thought I would start with you first.” It didn’t quite work as she seemed hesitant to respond. Nevertheless, I had to strike a conversation and I went on with a “so, what’s your major in your undergraduate studies?” Like a freezing arrow striking through my body, she gave a chilling reply by saying “physics.” I was taken aback by her response. You are probably wondering why. Well, I still held prior beliefs from my younger days that girls would not venture into such ‘hardcore’ fields. I really did hold this view.

I foolishly proceeded to ask her, “so tell me, why are you in physics? Isn’t it tough for a girl?” Exasperated, she looked away without looking into my eyes and asked me instead, “so what did you major in university?” I mentioned life sciences and she quickly responded, “so tell me, why did you major in the life sciences? Isn’t it supposed to be for girls?” This was a slap to my face. I was awakened up by her swift and witty reply. Instead of feeling ashamed or angry, I smiled and apologized to her. Thankfully, she reciprocated with a smile I had not seen before. On the surface, she looked like a snow princess with a heart of ice, deterring many from starting a conversation with her. Once we warmed up, I could see a sunny and cheerful character beyond the layer of ice.

I was fascinated by both her personality and her passion for physics. We continued to talk night after night. Her knowledge of physics to quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics allowed me to better appreciate physics from a bit-size point of view. In view of my interest, she even provided me with her university textbooks and notes so that I could read them during my spare time. Likened to Marie Curie, she was a physicist who was also versed in chemistry.

Explore Next:  Unsung: William Claytor

I continued to learn more about her.

Despite her achievements, she shared with me that no one had ever acknowledged her strengths in physics and chemistry. She felt this was because she was female. I was saddened and felt ashamed and angry on the spot. I wanted to learn more about her story in science. Coming from a family without anyone in science, her motivation to do physics was purely self-driven. In her younger days, she would play with all kinds of toys without any differentiation by gender because the toys were passed down from her elder brother and sisters.

Without stifling any experience, she could build up skills such as dismantling and fixing stuff which ignited her passion for engineering. In elementary and high school, physics became her best performing subject due to her ability to relate the physics concepts she learned to the engineering problems she faced in sports. Interestingly, she is petite in size but an avid lover of basketball. She even used physics in biomechanics to facilitate in her games – no doubt shooting became her forte based on her preferred displacement from under the net using her pre-calculated projectile motion.

In her undergraduate course – not only was she one of the top six in the honors class of which three were females – she was able to publish two scientific articles. In my view, this was a feat that awed me. But to this woman in front of me, her achievements were mere stochastic events independent of her. As our conversations increased in frequency, I begun to understand how gender could mask a woman’s accomplishment in science. I was clearly fascinated by this lady and without any doubt, I pled for her coaching in the field of physics.

My encounters with female scientists were plenty as I had the opportunities to converse and work with female scientists and principal investigators. The respect was never demanded, but earned through their intellectuality and perseverance in science. As for the lead woman in this story, my respect for her has only grown with time. After an amazing teaching career, she decided to pursue a doctorate in physics. Halfway into her graduate studies, she conceived and gave birth to her second child.

Nothing has stopped her from doing well in her research as she continues to develop metamaterial designs of broadband frequencies for applications in technology. And of course, even given her heavy family commitments, she continues to publish articles in her field. I guess I can only say I am fortunate to have this superwoman in science as my wife who continues to inspire me each day.


Yow Ying Ming Ivan is a PhD Student in the Mechanobiology Institute at the National University of Singapore. LinkedIn 

Cover image is by Public Co from Pixabay | CC0 Creative Commons

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Humans of HBI: Caroline Palavicino-Maggio

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending