Connect with us

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Playing in the Dirt and Calling it Science

CSM Lab

Published

on

 – By Stephanie Halmhofer | Bioarchaeologist – 

[dropcap]F[/dropcap]or some, the line from point A to point B is fairly straight.  For others, it’s a zig-zag.  I am definitely a zig-zagger.  I didn’t find an easy, straightforward path into becoming a bioarchaeologist.  To be honest, I don’t think any “easy” path in any career actually exists.  Nor should there be one.  Every mistake, rejection, challenge, and disappointment we face offers us teaching moments that we need to learn to recognize.  More importantly, we need to learn how to use them to better ourselves.

My path into science began as a kid growing up with parents who encouraged my interest in science.  From weekly science camps to science fairs and visiting Science World, my parents planted that science seed in my mind.  Yet a career in science didn’t jump out at me until halfway through my first university degree.  While doubting my choice of criminology I had the opportunity to take courses in archaeology and forensic anthropology.  Following writing a term paper on the Franklin Expedition, I knew I wanted to be a bioarchaeologist.

To say planning for grad school was mentally defeating would be an understatement.  But still, I persevered and, before I knew it, my hard work finally began to pay off.

Halfway through my Bachelor’s degree I transferred to a different university in a different province that would give me better bioarchaeological course options.  With that came enormous financial and emotional difficulties.  There were definitely periods of self-doubt and many nights wondering whether or not I was making the right choice.  My retail job barely paid enough to cover rent, let alone rent plus tuition and associated school costs.  And because I was working 40 hours a week between a full course load, my grades admittedly took a bit of a hit, which made me less competitive for scholarships.  With support and encouragement from my husband and family, I stuck with it.  I decided that if I was going to face these hardships I was going to work hard to overcome them and make sure I came out on top. 

Steph Halmhofer

Bioarchaeology is a field that relies just as much on outside field learning as it does lab and classroom learning.  You need to learn how to apply what you’ve learned in the classroom to your field site.  Which can be in a natural environment.  With wildlife.  For example, I recently had a bear and her cub walk into the middle of the site I was working on.  Classes definitely didn’t teach me how to react to their surprise visit!  I looked for and actively pursued any volunteer and work opportunity I could to gain the experience I needed.  It certainly wasn’t easy, but I’ve already mentioned that I’m a zig-zagger.

Following my undergrad, I decided to take a break and seek work within the field.  Though I knew I wanted to go to graduate school, I also wanted more field experience and knowledge.  My voluntary one year away from school involuntarily turned into nearly five years away, working in three different provinces across Canada.  Though I still feel there were more pros than cons associated with the choices I made, it was still fraught with challenge.  Some projects ended too early and left me scrambling for work.  Others lasted longer but kept me away from home for longer. 

Explore Next:  Eureka! My Path to Studying the Epigenome

Some I had to turn down because I couldn’t afford the associated costs.  Others added to the existing school debt I was trying to pay off.  At first, I delayed grad school applications because I was worried I couldn’t afford going back to school.  Then the struggle turned to finding a supervisor who would recognize my capabilities as demonstrated by my work experience and not my grades.  To say planning for grad school was mentally defeating would be an understatement.  But still, I persevered and, before I knew it, my hard work finally began to pay off.

At times of self-doubt, I pull out my C.V.  I see the two years I spent working for an amazing archaeology lab, which was not only my first archaeological collections job but also led to an undergraduate research award.  I see the volunteer work I did in two different labs which, along with the earlier lab work, led to two summer positions working in wonderful little museums and developed my collections research skills.  I see when I was hired onto a large, multi-year archaeological project before I even graduated with my BA.  I see the field skills, knowledge, and supervisory experience I gained from that work, which led me into the bioarchaeological work in British Columbia I started three years ago. 

I see how that work led to me being invited onto an incredible, collaborative research project I’ve been part of for three years.  I see how that work led to me beginning my Master of Arts degree at a fantastic university with an influential supervisor who recognized my skills and knowledge and saw my potential.  And now, as I sit here one month away from completing my M.A. as a first-generation scientist, I can see my first major post-graduate collaborative project beginning to develop.

I will always be open and honest about my hardships in pursuing my career. However, I’ll never use them as a reason to tell others not to pursue science.  For every hardship I’ve faced, I’ve also found success.  I’ve got a wonderful support system from my husband and my family which, along with my own stubbornness, has kept me going at the toughest of times.  At the end of the day, all these experiences have come together to make me into the bioarchaeologist I am today and one I can be proud of.  I love what I do.  I get to play in the dirt and call it science.

Visit Stephanie Halmhofer’s website HERE  

 

 

CivicSciTimes - Stories in Science

Unexpected Stories and Spindle Mistakes: Discovering that Wild-type Cells are Full of Surprises

CSM Lab

Published

on

By

Natalie Nannas

Natalie Nannas is an Associate Professor of Biology at Hamilton College in Clinton, NY. She teaches courses in genetics, molecular biology, and bioethics. Dr. Nannas graduated from Grinnell College with bachelor’s degrees in biological chemistry and French. She received her Master’s and PhD from Harvard University in molecular biology and genetics. Dr. Nannas conducted her postdoctoral research at the University of Georgia where she won a National Science Foundation Plant Genome Postdoctoral Fellowship. At Hamilton College, Dr. Nannas enjoys teaching and sharing her passion for microscopy with her undergraduate research students. When not glued to a microscope, she loves spending time with her husband and two daughters. The narrative below by Natalie Nannas captures the human stories behind the science from a 2022 paper titled “Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea mays” which was published by her group in 2022 in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Science never works out the way we plan. As scientists, we ask questions, hypothesize and outline our goals … then reality of science occurs. The reality of science is often full of failed controls, endless troubleshooting, and sometimes strange findings that lead us in new and unpredictable directions. Our publications give the impression that we planned these scientific journeys from the beginning and do not tell the human side of the process with all of its twists and turns, dead-ends and U-turns. I want to tell you the real story behind my first publication as a faculty member with my own lab. It did not go as planned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. My lab was shut down in the middle of our investigation, and my students and I were unable to generate new data. In the beginning, it seemed like we were stranded with only control data and no story to tell, but the time away from the lab allowed us to spend more time looking carefully at wild-type cells. What seemed like a dead-end suddenly became its own story when we found something unexpected hiding within microscopy movies. Our wild-type cells were making mistakes, attempting fixes and changing directions, just like we do as scientists.

My scientific journey began with flickering green lights and a microscope (you can read more about it here). As an undergraduate, I was mesmerized by the beauty of watching living cells shuffle fluorescently labeled proteins throughout their cytoplasm. I followed this passion for microscopy into my doctoral dissertation research at Harvard University where I investigated how yeast cells build the machinery needed to pull their chromosomes apart. This machinery is a dynamic collection of long protein tubes called microtubules and other organizing proteins that help move and shuffle microtubules. I loved watching the delicate dance of chromosomes interacting with microtubules of the spindle, and I wanted to continue studying this process in my postdoctoral studies.

During postdoctoral studies at the University of Georgia, I won a fellowship from the National Science Foundation to develop a new technique in microscopy. No one had ever watched plants building their spindles in meiosis, the specialized cell division that produces egg and sperm. Other scientists had performed beautiful microscopy studies observing how mitotic spindles function inside of plant cells, but due to the technical challenges, no one had ever observed live plant cells building spindles in meiosis. I was thrilled to take on this challenge by using version of maize that had fluorescently labeled tubulin, the protein that makes up microtubules of the spindle. With this line of maize, spindles would glow fluorescent green, allowing me to image if only I could extract the meiotic cells.

Dr. Natalie Nannas

We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took time to analyze the wild-type cells.

After almost a year spent dissecting maize plants, I finally managed to develop a method to isolate these tiny cells and keep them alive in a growth media long enough to image them. This new method of live imaging was going to serve as the foundation of my new lab at Hamilton College, a primarily undergraduate institution. With my students, I planned to investigate the pathways governed spindle assembly. Most animal mitotic cells have a structure called a centrosome that dictates how spindles are formed; however, female animal meiotic cells lack these structures and must use other pathways to direct spindle assembly. Plants also lack centrosomes, and I wanted to inhibit these known animal pathways in our plant live imaging system.

Explore Next:  Making My Way from Mountains to Mud: Part 1

As I set up my lab, my students and I collected live movies of wild-type maize cells building their spindles. I told my students and myself that these movies were not the main event, they were just the control cells so we would have a baseline comparison for our experimental conditions. We were so busy collecting data and prepping for our mutant studies that we never really took the time to analyze the wild-type cells. At the surface level, they built spindles and segregated chromosomes in a generally expected amount of time, so we focused on preparing for our upcoming experiments…. then March 2020 occurred.

The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour.

My students headed home for spring break with a warning that there may be a delay in coming back to campus due to the spread of COVID-19. None of us were prepared for the shutdown that followed. Like many colleges and universities, our campus was closed for the remainder of the spring 2020 semester and the summer of 2020. My students and I began meeting on Zoom, trying to make a new plan for our research. The only data we had to work with were the microscopy of wild-type maize cells, so we decided to spend time digging more deeply into these movies. Originally, we had only measured the total time it took to build a spindle as it would be a baseline for comparison to our mutants. We had not looked carefully at any of the intermediate time points in the assembly process. When my students looked more closely at our movies, they discovered that wild-type cells built an incorrectly shaped spindle over 60% of the time!

We found that maize meiotic cells often built spindles with three poles instead of two, and they had to actively rearrange their spindle structure to correct this mistake. We also found that in these cells, there was a delay in meiosis as cells refused to progress until this correction had been made. This is an exciting discovery as it showed that plants are error-prone in their spindle assembly, much like human female meiotic cells. Our findings also suggested that meiotic cells were monitoring their spindle shape when determining if they should move forward in meiosis. Previous work has shown that cells monitor the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle to make this decision, but our work adds a new dimension, showing that they also monitor spindle shape. As we continued to analyze our videos, we also learned that cells corrected their spindle morphology in a predictable way. They always collapsed the two poles that were closest together, creating a single pole and resulting in a correct bipolar spindle.

The image shows the first page of the paper which can be accessed here.

My students and I had begun our scientific journey planning to breeze over wild-type cells, moving on to what we envisioned would be a more exciting story of spindle mutants. The pandemic forced us to slow down and look more carefully at our wild-type data, and I am grateful for the detour. I rediscovered my love of closely watching flickering green fluorescent lights, the dance of microtubules sliding into place or making missteps and shuffling into new arrangements. Watching life attempt a complicated process, make mistakes, and try again, is a lesson that never grows old. It reminds me that our scientific journeys are just the same, they start in one direction but are fluid and constantly changing, and hopefully, they end with a functional spindle!

Read the Published Paper

Weiss, J.D., McVey, S.L., Stinebaugh, S.E., Sullivan, C.F., Dawe, R.K., and N.J. Nannas. 2022. Frequent spindle errors require structural rearrangement to complete meiosis in Zea maysInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (8):4293–4312.

ABOUT: Stories in Science is a special series on the Civic Science Times. The main aim is to document the first-hand accounts of the human stories behind the science being published by scientists around the world. Such stories are an important element behind the civic nature of science.

SUBMISSION: Click here to access the story guidelines and submission portal. Please note that not all stories are accepted for publication. After submission, we will let you know whether we have selected the story for the review process.

Continue Reading

Upcoming Events

Trending